RateBeer

Michelob Ultra

Percentile
n/a
overall

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
9601.04/5.01.05/5.04.2%0.1Dimpled mug, English pint, Lager glass, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Bottle: Filtered.
Ingredients: Pale two-row and Munich six-row barley, select grains, all imported hops and a pure cultured yeast strain.
Introduced in 1978.
Michelob Ultra, the new low-carb light beer with taste smooth enough to carry the Michelob name.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
beb5000 (23), Avon, Connecticut, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/102/51/101/55/20
Dec 19, 2002  
I tried based on the commercials. It is the last time I do that.


mimsy (8), Naples, Florida, USA
does not count click to see why this rating of Michelob Ultra does not count
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/54/20
Apr 27, 2002  
I found this to be refreshing, albeit very light in taste. The color is light and the flavor is watered down. Okay if you want to drink a light flavor lager. Not my type of beer normally though.


 bhensonb (4306), Woodland, California, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/56/20
Nov 4, 2007  
There is an aroma. Could be malt and hop. Very pale gold color with a decent white head. Very thin body with fizzy carbonation. The flavor is not bad - straight pale malt. It’s at least as tasty as a number of NAs (though not the Bitburger). Something of a paper/herb finish. Bitter is not detectable by my palate.


 OKBeer (1159), Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/52/102/55/20
Oct 21, 2009  
12 oz bottle, sampled 4/24/08. Pale straw yellow colour with a fully diminishing fizzy white head. Faint grainy aroma. Faint grainy flavour. Light bodied, dry and fizzy. Any less character and it would be like drinking a glass of air.


 raymow (738), Bensalem, Pennsylvania, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/54/102/56/20
Jan 17, 2004  
This beer has an absolutely horrible smell. I can't describe it - but it's bad. the color is just a step above the smell. The taste is bearable for this type of beer, but can you really call it beer?


 AdamSkillin (376), High Bridge, New Jersey, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/102/56/20
Jan 8, 2005  
When I first tried this beer, I thought it was really really horrid. Then Rolling Rock came out with a low-carb beer called Green Light. Then Coors came out with Aspen Edge. As far as intentionally low-carb beers goes, this is the best I’ve heard of. But Miller Light (while terrible), is still better, and the difference is 0.6 grams of carbohydrates per twelve ounce serving.


 madquacker (720), Canberra ACT, Australia
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/54/20
Feb 25, 2007  
Ultra watery should be the name. Could not identify much beer through the water. A piss weak colour and dissapating head. Too much of a price to pay I’m afraid for a few less KJs.


 RONCOD (106), Uledi, Pennsylvania, USA
1.4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/53/102/54/20
Aug 15, 2008    Updated: Jan 24, 2009
Pale yellow with a thin head. First experience with this was not too good, but the second was better. Still not as good as Amber Bock, but drinkable.



CONSIDER FREE RATEBEER MEMBERSHIP



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

SIGN UP NOW »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC