 GMUcrew7 (152), Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Apr 26, 2008
Very similar to other mass produced American lagers in all aspects, except it is less offensive. In true beer terms it is not really a good beer, but if forced to choose out of a lineup of its ilk I would pick this. Better tasting, smooth and drinkable.
changeup45 (525), Orlando, Florida, USA
Jul 9, 2008 This isn’t awful, mostly because there isn’t anything really all that foul about it. Standard swill look. Grainy, malty, rice taste. Thin, watery and weak mouthfeel but in this case that’s probably a good thing as it makes this thing easy to drink, non-offensive and almost refreshing.
Odyn (130), USA
Jul 8, 2008 Not really much flavor, and what there is really is pretty awful. Nice color, but no body. Finishes cleanly, but another bad AB product. At least Bud has a ricy taste.
subcell (94), Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
Jun 30, 2008 I really have nothing to say about this other than it’s your below average golden beer. I think Michelob Light is 150% better than this.
tastybeer (21), Gainesville, Florida, USA
Jun 19, 2008 Bottle. Golden beer with decent head, dissipates quickly. Sweet, but not much flavor otherwise. Mouthfeel is somewhere between sharp carbonation and macro taste. Using malt opposed to adjuncts really makes a difference, however. Pretty cheap in comparison to similar import lagers.
KimJohansen (2304), Copenhagen V, Denmark
Jun 16, 2008 Clear golden with large white head. Sweet fruity aroma with caramel and cardboard notes. Fruity flavor with cardboard notes.
|
