Nekronos (2264), Xalapa, Mexico
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 11/20 | Oct 20, 2004 Updated: Jan 31, 2006It’s a suprprise a light version of a beer actually tasted better than the first one.
I tasted this but I found no interesting thing about it but the fact it didn’t taste like a tire. jezmez68 (334), Chesterton, Indiana, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Jul 1, 2003 See comments on the original MGD, and then add a few derogatory comments and there you have it. I kind of thought Miller would have just stopped with Lite and not worried with making light versions of their other beers. What's the point? A person can only drink one can of Miller beer at a time, so why spend the money on can design, marketing, etc. If they woulda just stuck with the main three, they'd have been all right. Shipman (48), Spring City, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Apr 7, 2003 I may be a little unfair in rating this beer because of my favorable impression of miller products. It is a pretty damn good light beer. Has a nice color and doesn't have a watered down taste. Turtboy (120), Lucasville, Ohio, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Jan 11, 2003 Much better than Bud light, but really what is that saying? Crash (449), Macomb, Illinois, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Nov 6, 2002 STAMEEX (5), Pennsylvania, USA does not count | 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 1/5 | 10/20 | Jun 17, 2004 As far as beers so light that they they taste like beer-flavored-water, this one is not half bad. JPDIPSO (4939), Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Oct 26, 2002 Light straw with a a thin white head. Slightly grassy aroma. Woody and mild, mild malt flavor. Finishes with a dry powdery paper finish. Most likely what an American Light should be. A bit fizzy in the mouth. DougiePhiTau (99), USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Dec 10, 2004 Not horrible not that good better than bud light.It also has more alcohol than bud light too. But spend a few more buck and get a real pale lager
|