 beerman991979 (137), Old Town, Maine, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Oct 4, 2000
The more points here goes for a mildly better taste. By mildly, I mean I rather less want to die after drinking this compared to beast or beast lite.
IkesNephew (12), Henderson, Nevada, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 |
Oct 25, 2009 12 oz. cans. I shudder to think I used to buy this in 30 packs. Only bought to get the most drunk for your buck. Not amber, more of a clear grayish brown with a white foam, if you care enough to pour it. About the closest a beer gets to tasting the same on the way in as on the way out (I would guess). Watered down and bitter, with a lot of metal flavor leaking from the can, which is the only thing you taste in the finish. Large gulps become refreshing after about 4 cans. Milwaukee’s BEST? I’d hate to taste their worst. Blech. Avoid.
wvudan (10), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Oct 23, 2009 Good god, I drank this in high school and with working class blue collar truckers on my Blue Collar SportsChat USA Tour 2008 - ’see website’.. It’s cheap.. and if you’re looking for a quick drunk, this is probably the one to take.. Tastes of aluminum though, I can’t drink these anymore, goes right to the stomach..
BEWARE: Find a toilet the next morning, you will need it.
Liquiddinner (9), M.O.P. aka Mayor of Perkins, Michigan, USA
does not count  | 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 7/10 | 5/5 | 11/20 |
Oct 6, 2009 Can’t complain with the price and it’s ability to throw you under the bus. It’s great to get your chick on this, you’ll be wandering down in her pasture in no time. Good luck.
brenn79 (201), Idaho, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 |
Oct 2, 2009 12 oz. can- Pours decent enough, nice head, looks like most large scale lagers. I was suprised i didn’t hate this beer, now that’s not to say that I liked it either, It is infinitely better than Icehouse (one of the worst beers I’ve ever had) but infinitely worse than any good beer.
astrofrk (219), Knoxville, Tennessee, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Sep 19, 2009 Piss yellow. Small, fast head. Aroma: Cereal, cardboard. Flavor: Same with chemicals, sort of like licking a street railing. A higher level in "Beer-Hell",
compared to many other "Bum-beers".
And to think I used to drink even worse in my Navy days. This beer hobby has spoiled me but if I were homeless, at least I will know how to get the best "Bang for the Buck" with whatever I do have.
poisoneddwarf (199), Rathdrum, Idaho, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
Sep 19, 2009 12 oz can. This is part 3 in a trilogy. I tried Milwaukee’s Best Light earlier (part 2), which was obviously a masterpiece of shit masquerading as "a light, refreshing lager." Will this one be any better? First thought: Oh boy, do I really want to drink this? I drank a Mil Best Light earlier tonight and it wasn’t a pleasant experience. Anything’s better than a light cheapo lager, right? Tentatively...yes. It doesn’t taste like a sparkling water like the Light did--definitely more flavor. Part threes are rarely the best in a trilogy, but this is definitely better than part 2. All in all, it tastes like mass-produced crap. I need to find out how it all started with part 1, though--the original Milwaukee’s Best. I don’t have one though. How will I ever figure it out?
drowland (1417), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 22, 2009 Oh boy... this is NOT even worth the low price and high content. Putrid, putrid stuff.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)