 BMan1113VR (2960), Los Angeles (and Dallas), Texas, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 12, 2007 Updated: Mar 14, 2008Beer with nondescript aroma, small head with virtually no lacing, that diminished to nothing quickly. Short duration with a sour finish. Body is medium with soft carbonation and a near metallic finish. Only real redeeming quality is the cheap price. Bests Miller and Budweiser for taste per price segment, but nothing great. Was curious, now I have satisfied my curiosity but not my taste buds.
badlizard (2396), Berkeley, California, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Dec 10, 2007 Jug bottle from TJs. Medium brown color with a fizzy head. Faint sweet aroma and a rather bland taste. I’ve had better.
glaze0101 (79), USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
Dec 5, 2007 amber/brown more carbonated and lighter than I remember (it had been a while) and not as rich or good as I remember
DTM (541), Winters, California, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 1, 2007 Poured a dark Amber color. Lots of carbination and little body. Sweet and malty in flavor with little to no hops. Not very impressed.
timfoolery (484), California, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Dec 1, 2007 Poured a dark amber/brown color. This beer was a little too carbinated at first, but as the carbination wore down it was much better. For the packaging and price, I could get a bit more flavorful product, although it was very smooth.
alaskanwarren (286), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 29, 2007 Amber colored with a generous head. Comes across really malty, not a lot of hops in the nose or flavor. I used to drink this alot years ago, but generally not all that excited about it now that I’ve had so many more interesting beers. Still, pretty drinkable and I wouldn’t turn one down. I wouldn’t dare call this a porter though. What’s up with that?
kseecs16 (914), Naperville, Illinois, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Nov 20, 2007 Jug. Poured a red hued bbrown with a medium off-white head, some lacing. Aroma is slightly floral, a bit stale malt, very pale lagerish in character. It does remind one of a black and tan, some raost characteristics and a slightly floral grassy note with a touch of sweetness. Light and tingly mouthfeel.
jacobwennbom (274), Uppsala, Sweden
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Nov 6, 2007 This beverage does not taste bad, that is not the thing. In fact, I even like the taste. It’s main problem is that is way too thin and taste way to little. It’s burnt malt and fresh hoppy notes, a combination only too rarely enjoyed in my case. But it feels like water in your mouth and for a beer with the word "mud" in the name that simply cannot be ment to be the case. Good but not great. Well, the bottle actually looks great though.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)