 KAggie97 (2464), Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Mar 27, 2005 Updated: Apr 29, 2006A guilty plesure if there ever was one. It’s got all the characteristics of a good amber with a hint of chocolate and caramel. Slight white wine in the finish. I first had this in Colorado, and I buy this one every once in awhile. It’s good; not the best, but it’s good.
RAYBOY01 (1834), Chicago, Illinois, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Mar 26, 2005 I have always enjoyed this trashy brew. Whenever I have given one to a friend, they have politely gagged it down. An old Spanish saying: If three people call you an ass, put on a saddle. I still enjoy it, and would have difficulty explaining why!
SDalkoholic (1196), Chula Vista, California, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 25, 2005 Faint aroma of malt and hay. Mahogany brownish beer and thin fluffy head. Does resemble more of a pilsner than any porter flavors. Barley sweet, caramel malt and some grass notes. Not a very good black and tan.
csbosox (1081), Prairie Village, Kansas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 22, 2005 Growler type bottle. Reddish color with an off white head. Malty, caramelly nose with some roasted? notes. Taste is pretty much what you would imagine a decent porter mixed with a pilsner, that is malty, caramelly, pleasant, but nothing special. I would have rather just tried the porter.
Lou18 (1353), West Paterson, New Jersey, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Mar 12, 2005 Drank this before, tried it again. Average , only average, but they do market this well.
DragonStout (1380), Pataskala, Ohio, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 9, 2005 I like this beer for 2 reasons.Its tastey, not the best but average and I also put this in my baked beans in a slow cooker overnight.This could be abit more robust.I really like to taste the porter.I felt it was masked a bit.Overall an average smooth drinking brew thats good for cooking with.
Guitarsessions (21), Crestline, California, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 4, 2005 First black and tan. I like Black more I believe. Very murky taste..... Mud is right. I think of mud when I taste this. It is an ok beer. Could be better... needs to be less muted.
SuIIy (1453), Jamaica Plain, Massachusetts, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 1, 2005 I really like the jug. it makes it seem like the beer is worth buying, which it really isnt. its pretty much bland. average color, not something I would buy in a regular bottle
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)