Lumpy (1802), Carrollton, Texas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Jul 20, 2004 Bottle. Nose is mild with some grapefruit. Amber body with a thick fluffy off-white head. Notes of smoke, raisin, plum, and malt come through. Finish is smooth and clean and smokey. Not bad at all. LiamPatrick16 (124), Montgomery, New York, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jul 10, 2004 decent for a pre fabricated black and tan. definatly better then yuengling and it had a cool jug bottle. It was relativly smooth and tastefull not my favorite type but decent none the less. yet I dont think i will go back for seconds anytime soon. ross (1709), weddington, South Carolina, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jun 5, 2004 taste like shit. nasty, gross, doesnt even pour like a porter- dont know why it is classified as one. this isnt worth a damn. no coffee flavor, no chocolate flavor, no flavor. 00cobraR (1098), Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jun 5, 2004 This beer is dark amber color with a tan head. A slight aroma of choclate with a light dunkel flavor. stubby (326), Santee, California, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Jun 1, 2004 I’m giving this one higher marks than most folks. The packaging/gimmick is corny, almost offensive, but the beer itself is damn good. Kind of like a mild dunkel. Porter is the wrong category for this jug beer. Better than some dunkels, as a matter of fact. shadey (1500), Rochester, New York, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | May 27, 2004 I can’t believe this stuff is only 20th percentile. I paid $3 for a QUART of this stuff and I thought it was delicious. A black and tan that tastes this good and is cheap enough to drink all the time deserves a bit more respect. PhillyBeer2112 (2089), Orange Park, Florida, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | May 24, 2004 Updated: May 31, 2009Attractive darkened amber with large foaming head. Aroma of caramelized malts, a mild dose of spicy hops. Barest hint of chocolate in the nose, which comes through better on the palate, with a semi-dry finish. Generally balanced and clean featuring malts. Medium bodied and quaffable. Certainly not complex but still rather pleasant and a fine enough session beer. It may be a blend of pilsner and porter, but it sure could pass itself off as an oscura lager. Rerate: tastes more like a weakened porter. DougShoemaker (2856), Toronto, Canada
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 24, 2004 Sweet malty nose, copper, small tan head. Watered down chocolate flavour with a smidge of malt. Very thin, nothing special save for the little Beverly Hillbillies jug!
|