Slick (1962), Thief River Falls, Minnesota, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Aug 4, 2003 Corn,corn and more corn thats as far as this brew goes nothing special here guys just another macro worth missing low on flavor and high on nothingness.Overall it's worth trying but little more then that. phishpond417 (1953), Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Aug 22, 2008 Yes I did. When I was 18-19 this was the killer- a case for $9.99- Can it get any better?!! Horrible beer, at a recent family gather I actually took a can of this out of the hand of a relative and threw it into the fire. Straw yellow, lots of carbonation- watery all the way through. altonbrownd (1951), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 8, 2009 Jan 1, 2009
Another popular canned beer back in the college days. As bad as Natural Light but a bit higher alcohol content. Nothing much to say for it now though. Watery and metallic-tasting.
BillKismet (1949), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 5, 2002 Stronger, but even worse tasting than natural ice--which is difficult to put into non-profane words. StewardofGondor (1934), Washington Heights - Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Feb 4, 2005 Drank this in the summer of 1998. My dad had several cans of these tucked away in the corner of the basement as leftovers from some party that he had bought beer for. I was young and unafraid. For that evening when my brother and I tipped many back, I give this an overall impression of 5. Outside of that, well, I now know how to say "no" to bad beer. ABUSEDGOAT (1934), California, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Mar 6, 2005 Updated: Oct 20, 2005Imagine a bad Budweiser. Even the description says it’s ’subpremium.’ This is Anheuser-Busch! tronraner (1933), Seymour, Tennessee, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 18, 2005 This is vile. It was all I could do to drink enough of it to rate it. I started getting a headache a few sips in. It’s ONLY redeeming characteristic is price. Drainpour. Shag (1923), Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Mar 14, 2003 For getting ripped is the only good I can find. Tastes horrible and I can see the only reason for this beer's existence is for a good drunk. Otherwise for taste purposes, leave it alone!
|