 stangger (156), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Dec 9, 2007 Of all the super-cheap college macros, I’ve always found this to be the most drinkable. Don’t get me wrong - it tastes like metal, but it has a high enough alcohol content to be noticeable. For a good beer, this would be a bad thing. But when the alcohol tastes better than the beer, it becomes a good thing.
jerkadilly74 (155), mooresville, Indiana, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 18, 2003 When I try a macro-brew for the first time, I usually give it some points for being a mass produced type of brew. Well I'll just say this, steer clear of this fuckin' beer here. Absolutely worthless, tastes like walnuts!! The only good thing here is that were working with 5.9% abv. This is a great beer for the absolute poorest of individuals who just want to get wasted. Poor college students should even stay away from this shit because Nat Ice is really bad news. I think this may be my worst rating, and I am usually very objective
BobbyW3363 (154), Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Jan 5, 2006 Why am I drinking this? Aroma sucks, smells like corn I guess, fizzy head disappears quickly. The color is a nice yellow, but I wonder if it’s artificial. Flavor is somewhat metallic, mostly tastes like rainwater. Okay, its not the absolute worst beer I’ve ever had, but it’s pretty close. It gets some overall points for having a decent alcohol percentage and not making me gag when I take a sip.
TheBeerGenius (153), Erie/Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 26, 2001 High Alcohol content and cheap price are always a good combo, but this stuff sucks
ampp (152), Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Nov 9, 2001 Malted water.. with high carbonation and a fairly high alcohol content. I know people that I consider friends who actually love this stuff. It has to be because it is very cheap and has a fairly high alcohol content. By the time you get to your fourth can you are so Ripped that you forget how FOUL it tastes. You are feeling NO PAIN....
jpm8920 (152), Park Ridge, New Jersey, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Apr 23, 2001 cheap, high school, ’let’s get loaded’ kinda beer. it’s high content and cheap, but tastes nasty as hell.
aarossell (151), Grandville, Michigan, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Dec 2, 2006 What’s amazing is that people still buy this Anheuser shit even though they give brewing and drinking a bad name. "yay, let’s get so wasted on shit beer that we have hangovers and ruin things!" Never accept this beer.
Blatz King (150), Whitewater, Wisconsin, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 10/20 |
Mar 19, 2001 This is the worst beer I have ever had.
I would rather drink Busch Light....wait
no I wouldn’t. It may be Ice, but it is far from
being a cool beer.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)