Lumpy (1802), Carrollton, Texas, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Sep 9, 2004 Can. Crystal clear light gold body with a thin bubble film. Smells like musty cardboard. Tastes like every other BMC piece of shit you have ever had, with the exception that it leaves a note of vomit on the finish. I could drink this if I was really drunk, but so what? I could drink raw sewage if I was really drunk. And I would probably take that over this swill. Smoke3Smokes (72), Boone, North Carolina, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Feb 28, 2005 Insta Headache. I would rather put away a 40 or a 64 of Ole E 800 than slam back some Natty Ices. But if you only have $1.09, you could be in buisness. OhioDad (2491), Hilliard, Ohio, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Sep 17, 2005 16oz can = pretty much the same thing as the natural light except it tastes like someone injected grain alcohol in the can. Much more potent than expected. morrdt (608), Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | May 10, 2006 Updated: Mar 4, 2008Can. Clear, pale yellow color with a light white head. Am I drinking water? This has to be a joke. Drink this if you are truly poor, drive a pick up truck, live in Tennessee, and have two hounddogs who do nothing but sleep on your front porch. The only good thing about this beer is the alcohol content. 505 (271), Echo Park, California, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Aug 13, 2006 I decided to defy all expectations and make this my 100th beer, sandwiched between 2 alesmiths. This pours very pale, aroma is green apples/grain. Unbearably thin, but I would take this over many light beers that are rated slightly higher. Also, it’s only 94 cents for a 24 oz. My Alesmith Grand Cru and Speedway were both 9+ dollars for only a bit more, what’s with that? DukeofURL (1), South Pittsburg, Tennessee, USA does not count | 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Nov 28, 2005 The bottle IS better than the can here. All the comments about metalic taste simply don’t count. After two, who cares anyway since its cheap?
There IS a tiny trick I use however. I store beer in the fridge. Then, using a freezer thermometer and timer, drop the temp below 32 F. and drink directly from the bottle. I am poor and there is simply NO better choice in my price range...
This time and temp works with any beer. You can make Milwaukee’s Best drinkable, even Pabst. BeerAteHer (384), St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 6/20 | Jul 11, 2005 Pretty much a basically bad pale lager, but not as offensive as some. Typical drab appearance and light gold color. The aroma aspect is sewer pee that ranks with the worst. Flavor is strong corn and alcohol but not the typical gutwrench going down. oh6gdx (8903), Vasa, Finland
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Feb 28, 2008 Canned (Thanks Bolagshataren). Pale yellow colour, mediumsized white head. Aroma is maize, ice and mild vegetables. Flavour is vegetables, maize and some ice.
|