Bassy15 (60), Cullowhee, North Carolina, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Apr 25, 2004 thick yellow, and no head. taste is... oh does it really matter? if you are drinking this it is going down as fast as you can make it. I don't know anyone that would sit down and try to give this a rating. It gets ya drunk for cheap and makes you feel cheap the next day. SkyinBrian (429), Collinsville, Illinois, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | May 22, 2005 ok, ice brewed for a smooth or something like claims the bottle. i have definately had worse from the big 3, and at 5.9% this is one of the most efficient ones. i say this one is underrated. it is on teh 0 percentile while clearly belongs in at least the 1st percentile StFun (534), Indiana, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 5/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Jan 28, 2008 Come on, this beer does what it does and thats gets you drunk for cheap. Stronger content than a lot of other macros. Is it "good" in the same way the crafts are? No, but sometimes you just want to kick back and relax without all the snobbery of beer tasting. Or maybe thats just me! :) PS. I love Snojerks reasoning! GG (1678), NorCal, California, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Jul 16, 2009 I don’t know how my neighbors can do this. I’m pretty open minded with what people like to drink, but damn...they gotta have some fucked up sense of taste or smell or something. Just...ugh. I mean, it’s not offensive to look at, and if you keep it at that level then it’s cool. Smell or taste this and the fun is over. A typical clear pale golden yellow pour, with a foamy white head. No lacing, just a quick melt. Green apples, metal, and corn in the aroma. Strange veggie-like sweetness on the palate (sweet onions?), more green apples, corn with a touch of bitterness. Strange that a brewer would devise a process to make a shitty beer even MORE shitty, but..whatever. altonbrownd (1966), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 8, 2009 Jan 1, 2009
Another popular canned beer back in the college days. As bad as Natural Light but a bit higher alcohol content. Nothing much to say for it now though. Watery and metallic-tasting.
rmussman (906), California, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Mar 4, 2007 Sampled many times at college. Not bad when you drink it if its cold, but sampled warm its horrible. Higher alcohol content is better than Natural Light. Goes down smooth, but still not worth it. uvajed (112), Ravenna, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Jul 6, 2003 What do you want, it is 5.9% alcohol, right? A cheap beer to get you drunk, nothing more. Watered down garbage, yet exactly what you pay for. shrubber85 (3014), Wallhalben, Germany
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Aug 20, 2005 Can. Sweet grassy malt aroma. Light golden yellow color with little head. Sweet malt flavor - little body. Nothing offensive - okay if you’re looking for a cheap buzz - a better choice than Bud Light.
|