RateBeer
Natural Ice 1.03 686

Natural Ice

Percentile
n/a
overall

bottled
common

on tap
unknown

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreABVStyle PctlServe in
6861.01/5.01.03/5.05.9%1.2Lager glass, Paper Bag, Shaker
Commercial Description:
Anheuser-Busch introduced Natural Ice in select markets in 1995 and took it national in 1996. This subpremium-priced ice beer, 5.9 percent alcohol by volume, has a smooth taste.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 Hab40oz (242), Grants Pass, Oregon, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/103/52/101/53/20
Aug 6, 2004  
not the worst thing I’ve ever tasted but close this one gives the beast a run for its money in the worst beer ever catagory, good alch content, 5.9% not too shabby for musk rat urine.


 fro2218 (466), Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/103/52/103/51/20
Sep 28, 2007  
Natty Ice. The cheapest keg in town. A frat house delight. Not too much of this getting drunk at my house.


 nick76 (2678), Tampa, Florida, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/53/102/54/20
Mar 8, 2005  
24oz can. Even being ice cold can’t save this beer. It is so very similar to Natural Light and that’s not a good thing. It does actually have a little more malt taste and of course more alcohol but still sub-par in every way. Overall, bad smell, yellow color, cheap taste, not good.


spnkyoumuch (24), Seattle, Washington, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/53/101/53/20
Aug 17, 2005  
Rate this against a good IPA, amber or stout and it’s completely apples an oranges. Rate this in it’s the category of "Ice brewed" and it’s about average. mmmmmaybbe slightly smoother than MB ice, which is cheaper. BTW, it’s impossible to "ice brew". This is code name for "avoiding malt liquor classification".


 TINOZACCA (146), Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/101/51/101/57/20
Aug 24, 2005  
I only rate this higher than Natural Light because of the higher alcohol content. But taste wise it is worse. Some people claim to love it. But they are just cheap and liars.


 sinkhole (178), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
3/102/52/101/53/20
Jul 29, 2008  
Poured pale and clear with a minimal white head. Minimal aroma and taste (corn and malt?). Very watery and not worth trying.


 mhelgason (495), Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
2/102/52/101/54/20
Apr 19, 2008  
Huge freakin’ can. I am not sure why but I prefer this one to some of the other malts that I have tried lately. I will agree that it is probably due to its closeness to pale ales. water and grass permeate. not good but like said this is one of the better malts.


 ewestern (198), Ohio, USA
1.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
1/102/53/101/54/20
Sep 8, 2009  
Watery beer. More potent than some macro brews. Extremely smooth but not pleasing to the mouth.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC