faroeviking (6024), Republica Vikingo de las, Faroe Islands
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jan 17, 2007 Can. Pale yellow, no head. Weak grainy aroma. Very weak taste, just drinkable. Hardly worth calling it beer. wernesgruner (45), USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 16, 2007 tastes like waterd down piss, only way to drink it is to chug, and since its a lowly 4.2 uve got to chug alot. nramsburg (200), New York, New York, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 2/5 | 2/20 | Jan 13, 2007 Doesn’t taste like much, but hey, isn’t that the point? When you’re shotgunning and/or drinking double digits of the stuff, why taste? At least it’s not offensively bad, like, say PBR, rather more of just an inexpensive libation. jmikolich (405), Athens, Ohio, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Jan 9, 2007 Didnt even have to change the numbers for my rating. 12oz can, and lots of them makes up an average weekend at college. Natty as its affectionately called is the lowest of the low, but it tastes like cheap beer to those who have never had anything better than bud light and goes down like water for those of us who drink real beer. and after double digits of these you do feel quite refreshed. dwyerpg (2529), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 | Jan 3, 2007 Little to no aroma, but not funky like I thought I’d remembered. Very thin and ricay, it doesn’t taste like anything (which actually raises the score slightly once you’ve the worst beer ever: Huebert’s Old Tyme Lager). Not good, but slightly better that I remembered. Also, this score may be slightly inflated since I was working hard all day before having this. Ya know, the lawnmower effect. jodyperkins (70), Mississippi, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Dec 30, 2006 I can proudly say that I’ve drank less than 6 of these in my life and not one of them was paid for. That’s about all I can say good about this beer. Aurelius (2646), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 | Dec 27, 2006 Accepted as a courtesy from a friend of mine on vacation. Forgot that I hadn’t rated it. 5 years without a Natch Lite (since I’ve been on this board) must mean that I’ve been living right - used to drink a good bit of this in college back in the 80’s. Bland malt liquor aroma. Worthless appearance - pale fizzy water, bad can (what are the two boomerangs supposed to represent). Very light hopping, banana esters. Bad. Yech, I’d forgotten exactly how bad this was. DaMenace123 (251), Houston, Texas, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Dec 26, 2006 Terrible beer that tastes like nothing. Now to meet the character limit..................
|