trendkill (2), East Lansing, Michigan, USA does not count | 5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 20/20 | Mar 23, 2006 OK... this review may get me blacklisted from all of those beerraters who live the "high life" (no pun intended), but I belive that this beer is THE premire light beer. I wont even touch any other light beer unless it’s given/bought for me. Say whatever you want about the aroma and flavor, but what it alll comes down to is that this stuff is made for the poor man. I drank this suff religously in college and still do today. "I WOULD RATHER HAVE A NATTIE THAN BUD LIGHT / MILLER LITE!" Its not my absolute favorite... but you can get a "dirty thirty" for about 15 bucks Papsoe (14841), Frederiksberg, Denmark
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | Mar 21, 2006 (Can 35,5 cl) Pale golden with a creamy, white head. Lightly sour nose - rice? Very thin and watery body. Slightly sticky, sweetish malt and rice. Abolutely no traces of hops. 210306 sisyphus12 (98), Belmont, Massachusetts, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 | Mar 16, 2006 This beer I vaguely remember in undergrad but I was recently reunited with this beer that is at least partially responsible for the "how is making love in a canoe and drinking american beer similar"
not recommended unless desperate beerdrinker101 (56), USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 | Mar 6, 2006 There is a very good piece of advice that I can give you when buying this beer. You get what you pay for. Zinnamon (40), Columbus, Ohio, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Feb 26, 2006 I think everyone knows this beer is for quantity not quality. This beer smells like drunk. hrgriffey (1), USA does not count | 5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 10/10 | 5/5 | 10/10 | 5/5 | 20/20 | Feb 26, 2006 THE AROMA OF HOPS FOUND WITHIN THIS MASTERPIECE IS EVER PRESENT. DIFFICULT TO FIND IN BOTTLE FORMAT, BUT IF YOU DO PLEASE GRACE IT WITH YOUR PRESENCE. THE ARTWORK ON THE CANS REMIND ME OF THE TIME I DID A TOUR OF EUROPE AND VISITED THE FRENCH ALPS. pooperscoopers (1), peoria, Arizona, USA does not count | 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Feb 26, 2006 This beer is garbage. The only reason I ever drink it is because my friend buys it. It doesnt even give me a buzz and it tastes like crap. kingfiogojr (78), Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/20 | Feb 21, 2006 Updated: Apr 22, 2006All in all, for the money, it’s really not terrible. I would put this in the category of lawnmower beer. It’s VERY thin, and very low-alcohol to boot. But it’s refeshing on a hot day. The problem is that it’s essentially tasteless. Even more so that the normal macrobrews. If drinking for taste is the key, then avoid. If fueling a party or doing college drinking is the MO, then by all means, pick up a 13 dollar 30 pack.
|