 joet (1709), Fulton, California, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Sep 1, 2001 A friend was invited to sample this ’local brew’ while in middle America being entertained by the locals in a game of hole hunting, where burrows were located in a field and whatever was in them became part of the evening’s menu. Apropos.
ross (1709), weddington, South Carolina, USA
| 0.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Jun 30, 2003 haha natty light, the beer of champions, or people that want to drink at least 15 to get a buzz goin
SudsMcDuff (1704), was CapeTown,SA-now Houston, Texas, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 |
Nov 14, 2006 I hate this beer, alot. It has absolutly no flavor,no head, no beer smell (smells like a dumpster), and no right to to be drunken by anyone over the age of 17! this is kids beer man!
Odeed (1679), Bakersfield, California, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Apr 23, 2005 ON TAP!!!(yeah thats right.)yellow body,white head,and loads of corn in the aroma and taste.hey it was a dollar a pint,and the ONLY thing they had.i love some of the dive bars i dj in.
hayduke (1667), Eureka, California, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jan 29, 2006 I could not detect any difference between this and the non-light version. Just as bad. I guess it has less alcohol, but it not clear if this is a blessing or a curse. Avoid this at all costs. Here is a case where the minimum rating is not low enough.
GG (1665), NorCal, California, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 |
Feb 26, 2008 Does this beer taste horrible? Well, if you drink it ice code, no. Hell, anti-freeze prolly doesn’t taste like much frozen...so there ya go. No aroma to pick up, and I wasn’t about to let it get warm. Appearance was your typical "fizzy yellow beer", light in color with a strange looking uniform head. Mouthfeel was light licking a 9-volt battery. Flavor of mineral water. Well, I was hot, thirsty and tired when I quaffed this. It did kill the fire, but does little to satiate the tastebuds.
Butters (1651), Virginia, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 |
Jul 8, 2008 For the fond fratastic memories of this beer, the overall goes up. Many games of strat have been enjoyed with this beer.
NachlamSie (1649), Tennessee, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Nov 1, 2006 Can. This tastes like soap, but less than the Nasty Ice variety, so I suppose it’s slightly less headache enducing. Looks like the only difference between this and the other Nasty varieties is a reduction of alcohol. Oh, the commercial description is nicely worded to provide a true, yet misleading statement. Sure, soap has a "pleasing aroma", but would you want to ingest it? That’s the question.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)