 Strykzone (1483), Wood River, Illinois, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 5/20 |
Nov 7, 2009
I picked this up thinking it was RateBeer’s Worst Beer in the World. Then I find it is the 3.2 ABV version of this. This version is bad but not the worst. It offers a big white fizzy head that lasts a couple of minutes leaving some lacing. There is a bit of corn flavor and a bit of honey in the aroma. A dirty metallic aftertaste. Strangely, its not as bad as hoped.
Plamadude30k (122), Tucson, Arizona, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 17, 2009 I can readily state that this is the worst beer I have ever had. I thought I had imbibed horrible tasting beverages before, but alas, I was wrong. I didn’t bother to pour it, since the proper vessel is a paper bag, but suffice to say it looks like apple juice in the jar with a disturbing soap-scum like froth on the top. The nose begins okay, like most lite beers but much more powerful, and quickly sours to a chemical fusel smell that is truly revolting. The taste takes a similar progression, but the badness is more pronounced, with sulfuric eggy tastes, a disturbing corn-chex bent, and this horribleness lingers for a LONG TIME. It tastes like a concentrate of corn chex slurry inside of a well-used garbage dumpster with bits of rotten egg, week old fruits/veggies, and moldy cheese allowed to sit in the sun for a day or two floating around.
Quoth my friend Pete: "Oh God! It’s still in my teeth."
Chilling. If you value your life, do not go anywhere near this...thing. Nuke it from orbit, it’s the only way to be sure.
Beardface (1024), Eugene, Oregon, USA
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Jul 4, 2009 Putting more alcohol into the mix doesn’t make it taste any less like liquid vomit. Completely without redeeming value, this brew.
ABUSEDGOAT (1934), California, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Sep 7, 2008 Pale golden yellow color, moderate head that dissipates, some lacing and retention. Aroma is grain, fusel, corn, a trace of hops. Lighter bodied, quite sweet obviously. Honestly, it’s not that bad.
Zbong (38), Lansing, Michigan, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Aug 4, 2008 This isn’t bad malt liquor! I’m used to East Coast Olde English and this stuff tasted way better and had a higher ABV. You should know what your getting with a malt liquor 40 oz. Does the job and is cheap.
MrBeerFanatic (360), jamestown, New York, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/20 |
May 16, 2008 I kind of grew up drinkin this crap. It has that gross sweet taste that offsets the malt and has a horrible aftertaste. Not the worst malt liquor I’ve had. Very cheap!
whiteman1488 (18), New York, USA
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 9/20 |
May 16, 2008 I know it’s no good, but it can still be fun to drink sometimes. Color-wouldn’t know, I drink it out of a brown paper bag. Taste- cheap beer. The trick is to drink it fast enough that you don’t taste it. Aroma-the sweet smell of failure.
antonius602 (1), USA
does not count  | 0.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 |
Apr 25, 2008 Just becuase I have to rate this on a the same scale I rate great beers is the only reason it scores to shallow. It really has been given a bad name by Eazy-E and the like. Malt liquor costs $2 / 40oz.for a reason. And that reason is: people should be able to have a proper drink and catch a buzz no matter how much money they have. This is a decent beer for a decent pirce...for an indecent occasion. And like the others...i’m sure i’ll get tagged "does not count", because i didn’t slam this beer...
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)