punkeedo (484), San Antonio, Texas, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Dec 30, 2009 2009 Bottle. Inexpensive and cheap ale. Not really worth a lot of time. Aroma of malt liquor. Appears like dark honey with little head. Flavors of spruce and caramel meld to make a fairly balanced, but uniteresting brew. mansquito (850), Boston/Philadelphia, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Dec 30, 2009 Pours a copper color, with an off-white head and lacing that is left all over the place. Aroma is not very impressive, but you can figure out some things from it then will thereafter be related in the taste: caramel malts. We then get some caramel malts all up in the taste. A lingering finish that gives a few different tastes all over the place. Some bitterness becomes apparent also. There is one more taste that I can’t put my finger on and neither did the last ten reviewers. Not great, but a good session. dogfish120love (291), west hartford, Connecticut, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Dec 29, 2009 Copper is fitting, because this beer smells like a penny . the aroma consists of burnt malts, some cereal and caramel with a faint hint of nuttiness. The pour is a rather clear...well copper I guess. the flavor consists of cereal and a somewhat bitter maltiness, which finishes dry and a little sweet. tommeagher (26), Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Dec 20, 2009 Nice, understated, but totally nondescript. Slight hints of coffee. Very dry. Would go well with a spicy or hot meal. Refreshing but ultimately tasteless. georgekillian (236), USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Dec 16, 2009 Very light beer pours with a beautiful amber color not overpowering on the bitterness and a very good blend of malts and hops. Overall a strong offering from this little known brewery marcus (1904), Sacramento, California, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Dec 3, 2009 Pours amber with a decent beige head and a bread and toffee aroma. There is a carbonated caramel malt flavor that is pretty thin. Drinkable but not remarkable. TeamTrappist (419), jericho, New York, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Nov 30, 2009 Tap. Poured a light and clear copper, duh, lol. Nose is sweet with light hops. This is a decent session beer. It’s all about the malt with this beer. The carbonation hits you then some sweet malts and your done. Not bad, and pretty drinkable. sinkhole (178), Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Nov 16, 2009 Bottle. Pours a light copper (shock!) with an average white head. Aroma is a good mix of malts and hops with yeast and caramel undercurrents. Taste is initially sweet (caramel) eventually giving way to the bitter hops and ends with a surprisingly blended finish. A nice but not outstanding beer.
|