 austinpowers (2828), New York, New York, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Aug 21, 2002 There’s a head, but it doesn’t stick around long. Smells nice. Tastes of...water. I’ve long felt that Sam Adams is a notch above Pete’s and the taste of this lager confirms it. Sam Adams’ lager, in contrast, packs a wallop of flavor. Pete’s Pub Lager is far better than Bud, but would benefit from a little more TLC.
gws57 (1144), Saint Charles, Illinois, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Jul 14, 2002 Not overwhelmed, not underwhelmed. It’s very average.
spydog (74), Tempe, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
May 5, 2002 Average lager.
labattblueleaf (225), Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Mar 24, 2002 Good lager. A little lighter than some, and very smooth.
I.C.suds (187), Da U.P. eh?, Michigan, USA
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Mar 12, 2002 Don’t waste your money on this one...
TheBeerCollector (548), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 |
Feb 22, 2002 Not very impressive but still better that Budweiser.
KenoTheDog99 (12), USA
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Dec 15, 2001 Like it a bit more than the other ’Pete’s’ I’ve had,
dolemike1 (1129), Jeannette, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Dec 13, 2001 Typical middle of the road lager. Decent flavor, easy to drink.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)