GG (1652), NorCal, California, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Jan 12, 2007 For a pale lager, this wasn’t horrible. It was drinkable with the homemade pizza I baked. An aroma of yeast, malts, grass and a little skunk but not really bad. Perhaps I got a fresh bottle? Appearance was clear and piss yellow with a nice white head (typical of a pale lager). Mouthfeel was light and evervescent. Flavors were also on the lighter side of things, with a lttle malt, a little hops and not much else. To rate with other lagers, it’s not bad. But on the overall scheme of things it’s not all that tasty. 1FastSTi (2577), Glendale, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Jan 9, 2007 Thanks John! Rating #1700! Such a funny beer to have. The beer pours to a thin watery light yellow body with a thin white head. The aroma is lightly floral and extremely plain. Unoffensive. The flavor is lightly grainy with subtle floral hops. Also unoffensive. A moderate body that finishes clean. Well made, simply REALLY boring. DavidP (1743), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Jan 9, 2007 Clear golden body. Clean grain and light corn aroma - not bad. The flavor is also clean with light lager malt and hop flavor - dandelion and orange. This is a good pale lager. JCapriotti (1378), Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Jan 9, 2007 Pale yellow. Thin creamy white head. Skunkish aroma. Light Millerish adjuncty character. Flavor isn’t horrible but its not interesting. Slightly bittered sweet water. MIBRomeo (1965), Wisconsin, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 | Jan 9, 2007 pale yellow color small dense white head some lacing and some visable carbonation. aroma is pretty skunky some hints of carboard and garbage & blah. Pal is avg. Flavor is not very good bad lager kinda nasty.. take it away. scanman (146), Santa Cruz, California, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Jan 6, 2007 Poured a pale yellow with good carbonation and lacing. Nice hoppy, spicy aroma with a little citrus. Pretty skunky, but not skunked because of the green bottle. There is a creaminess to it. Very acidic. Pretty refreshing. Recommended for pils/lager drinkers. I don’t know if I like the sourness much. LiebeBier (793), Annapolis, Maryland, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/20 | Dec 31, 2006 Bottle - A light yellow beer with little head. Had at Thai restaurant and is good with spicy food. Not much flavor beyond moderate amounts of grain and rice?. Mildly bitter on the finish. NosirIwont (1184), Aalborg Vestby, Denmark
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Nov 30, 2006 Bottle. Pours pale yellow-golden with a white head. Sourish cereal aroma with hoppy notes. Faint milky notes appear as it warms. Acidic flavour. Some hops maybe. Sweetish. Slightly bitter finish with faint notes of apple. Watery. Not a lot of flavour, really. So low score not because it tastes bad, but because it doesn’t taste of very much. Not a very interesting beer, but I’ve had far worse pale lagers (that DID taste bad). 01-12-06.
|