drowland (1435), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Aug 5, 2009 Had from the bottle into a pint glass at a restaurant. A surprise from a green bottle for sure... Not too shabby! No skunk, nice sweetness, and a somewhat corny fade. Nice drinkable lager. oh6gdx (9115), Vasa, Finland
| 1.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Aug 1, 2009 Bottled. Pale yellowish golden coloiur. Aroma is grains, yeast and quiterubber. flavour is qiote boringly rubbery and grass. quite blah blah. horrible. Oscbert (553), Sacramento, California, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Jul 28, 2009 ~Pours a pale clear gold with mild carbonation and big fluffy white head.
~Sweet malt and wet hay scent. Perhaps some saaz hops.
~Malty biscuity taste with spicy hops.
~Light crisp feel, clean quick finish.
~Nice made pale lager. Just like I expect them to be. Clean and refreshing. MrRoss (617), Delta, British Columbia, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Jul 14, 2009 I always want to pronounce this as "F*ket" but of course I know better. Sure I do. The hoppy aroma jumped out as soon as the cap came off, and that’s the best of it. A frothy white head reduced itself quickly, over top of a clear gold body. Aroma was not so bad. The taste was watery and weak, like a light beer, and seemed perfumed to boot. Aftertaste was pretty much nada. My second Thai beer, and for sure the lesser of the two. Singha is better and cheaper. mkel07 (562), Brisbane, Australia
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jun 30, 2009 330ml bottle. It is easy to see why Thailand is not re-knowned for it’s beer when they offer up stuff like this. Amber in colour with a foamy white head that rapidly diminished to to a slick of thin bubbles. Extremely low carbonation and a skunky aroma that adds nothing to the experience. Flat tasting with a horrid flavour. The best thing about this beer is the label. kddewees (33), Muncie, Indiana, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Jun 23, 2009 Goes down smooth. Did not meet my expectations. I bought it for the name to be honest. Pours a lemony yellow. Doesn’t have much of a head when you pour it out. Barreras (134), Diamond Bar, California, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Jun 22, 2009 Pours a light yellow with a typical lager taste. A little watery in flavor, not very complex. The best part of this beer is its drinkability. kiefdog (1647), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Jun 21, 2009 Bottle from a local Thai restaurant. Pours a light yellow color with thin head. Aroma is light with notes of honey, grass, wet hay, some light yeast. Flavor is light as well with notes of grass, yeast, honey, slight floral notes. Generally light body with watery finish. Not bad for a pale lager.
|