betamachine (3), Pasadena, California, USA
does not count  | 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Dec 9, 2007 Very drinkable beer. Goes down smooth, tastes best very cold, not so much warm. Flavor is not complex at all, not interesting, but plesent.
 thechandler (271), Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Dec 8, 2007 Pours an average pale golden hue, with an average white head. Taste is pretty average for that of a pale lager. No real hop flavor. no real malt flavor. Just a generic, average "beer" flavor. Average mouthfeel with average bitterness and average depth. Goes down pretty average.
I don’t know about you guys, but in my book, and "average" beer is pretty bad, and not worth trying again. Especially for something as pricey as this. Its just not worth it. Buy a generic American lager. It will taste pretty much the same, and you’’ save a couple of bucks.
Doon (90), Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Dec 8, 2007 Had at a company X-mas party in the bottle...Hadn’t tried in a LONG time...now I remember why...It’s more $$$ than BMC, but tastes the same...the unique bottle seems to be the only thing going for it. Just a regular lager...nothing special
superdude1979 (61), Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 5/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 |
Dec 8, 2007 Average beer. Goes down easy, kind of sweet, though ti is highly carbonated. Extra points for still being in a stubby! As long as it is on sale it is still better then the Bud/Coors/Miller garbage here.
NeoHippie2 (177), Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Dec 6, 2007 Updated: Dec 26, 2007A decent light beer. If you prefer a heavier more stout brew then this lager probably isn’t for you. However, if you are searching for a light lager that doesn’t sacrifice flavor for lightness, then I reccomend this brew. Nice flavor and finishes crisp and clean.
JJClark (546), Roscoe, Illinois, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
Dec 4, 2007 Bottle. Pours a light yellow color with a small white head. Aroma of malt and not much else. Has a hint of hops. Not bad but nothing to write home about either.
FlssmrBrewAlum (1177), Lisle, Illinois, USA
| 1.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 |
Dec 3, 2007 Bottle at a friend’s place. Pours a light urine yellow. Little to no smell that might or might not be vaguely sweet. Head is acceptable but dissipates as expected. A fairly carbonated brew. Smooth on the taste and goes down easy. However, very little flavor to speak of. Vaguely sweet (Like the smell I still don’t know was/wasn’t there). Slightly malty with notes of adjuncts. Not enjoyable and I’m generally open to the pale lager category.
Haslinger (666), Syracuse, New York, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 3/20 |
Dec 2, 2007 Updated: Mar 30, 2008very light taste, nice and drinkable. It is becoming easier and easier to find in the the US. My buddy who went to Umiami used to talk about ti all the time but it was hard to find in upstate NY now its getting easier
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)