RateBeer
Redhook Winterhook 3.09 689

Redhook Winterhook

Percentile
55
overall

bottled
common

on tap
available

Broad Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
6893.09/5.03.09/5.0Winter6%39.8English pint, Trappist glass
Commercial Description:
A rich, hearty ale brewed for a clean, dry, roasty palate.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 brianprentiss (475), Portland, Oregon, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/55/103/512/20
Oct 25, 2007  
not a bad beer, but for an english strong ale, there’s just not enough to taste. it’s rather piney tasting but there’s a nice cascade hop smell and it’s a pretty beer to look at. bottle from mollie stones palo alto, ca


 Feinschmecker (188), Seattle, Washington, USA
2.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/102/54/102/514/20
Oct 19, 2007  
Bottle. Copper and translucent. Not much in the realm of aroma. Faint hop aroma, maybe. The malt and hop flavor is light, what a let down. This one should not be a winter beer. It is neither rich nor hearty. The alcohol is too low and this beer does not deliver the winter goods.


 Bradrcr (781), Renton, Washington, USA
3.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/57/104/514/20
Oct 11, 2007    Updated: Nov 3, 2007
10/9/07 From September ’05 bottle. Aroma is complex, with dark dried fruit (primarily raisins), alcohol, earthy hops and quite portlike overall. Appearance is a deep red with a good off-white head. Flavor is sweet, dark fruity malt forward with same graininess and faint resiny hop flora. Mouthfeel is fairly grainy with a medium/high carb feel. Overall, this is definitely the best Winterhook I’ve had. The recipe jumps around each year, but I think that this ’05 aged to the point that the carb texture drops would be one of the excellent winter warmers; I wish I’d saved my other bottles longer.

10/15/07 On draught. Aroma is c-hop forward followed by light caramel. Appearance is hazy gold with a medium off white head. Flavor is sweet malt forward with moderate bittering and good hop citrus. Mouthfeel is medium-high bodied with a medium-high carb bite, good graininess, and leaves a dry feeling on the tongue; slightly warm. While this does have very good balance, I find I do miss the winter warmer flavor.


 robforbes (1099), Bremerton, Washington, USA
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/56/103/512/20
Oct 10, 2007  
orange-copper in color with a small white head. smell - roasted nuts, caramel, grain, hops, just a touch of spice taste - spice, oily, little bitter, a little sweet, some walnuts hidden way back in the flavor... good beer for the price.


 jb (1056), Rochester, New York, USA
2.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/102/512/20
Oct 6, 2007  
This brown-orange color seems to be the color I’ve been seeing in many many beers lately. Thin head on top. Stale grain aroma, along with cinnamon and nutmeg. Palate is somewhat toasted and has a high carbonation feel. This stuff is okay, nothing special.


 truegen (165), Puyallup, Washington, USA
2.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/56/103/510/20
Oct 2, 2007  
12 oz. bottle. This was better, once upon a time. Sample from the first batch into the local market, and I’m feeling let down. This is more like a summer ale than winter. The color is lighter, the nose and flavor more citrusy than in years past, and there doesn’t seem to be anything "roasty" about this beer at all. This is the ESB with a fake suntan. I like the ESB, and this is a drinkable beer, but there’s no Winter in this Hook.


 scrizzz (1323), kirkland, Washington, USA
3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/103/56/102/513/20
Sep 18, 2007  
strong ale at 5.5%? hints of caramel on the nose, good clean nut brown color. light flavor for a strong ale.


 sneezey (110), Hackettstown, New Jersey, USA
3.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/103/57/103/513/20
Sep 2, 2007  
Less hops than their ESB, a bit more balanced. Nice overall beer but not perfect. Bit toasty on the malt side, heavy but not too strong. Maybe just a bit thinner than expected but not bad.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC