 Shadallion (518), Sacramento, California, USA
Feb 4, 2004
Actually tastes very much like the original Rolling Rock, which means it's better than typical macro swill. However in cutting the carbs they must have chopped the alcohol content in half, because I just could not get a buzz off this lager. Would be good for sipping at a party where you have to drive later and you don't want to be seen drinking O'Douls.
nefarious (71), grand blanc, Michigan, USA
Nov 19, 2008 eeeeeeeewwwwwwwww......yuck. not horrible just run of the mill. No more no less
jimmack34 (161), Ohio, USA
Nov 19, 2008 Bottle. Just a wtered down version of rolling rock. Does have some skunk smell and a little hops to speak of. Not one of the better light beers.
TheBeerOrg (1402), Kentucky, USA
Nov 2, 2008 Among the least offensive of the macro lite beers. Pale yellow with fizzy carbonation. There are discernible hop notes, and with some slight crackery-ness. Light bodied, fizzy. I’m still not seeing the point of the lite beers.
SkyCop32 (139), Morlautern, Germany
Oct 26, 2008 This is a water version of Rolling Rock of course but not as bad as other light beers. The watery grain taste is what you would expect but it goes well if you are on a budget and a diet!
borgination (101), Lee, Massachusetts, USA
Sep 28, 2008 Great low carb beer. Goes down like water but i drank these things when i dieted for a while and they did the job.
|
