TypeSJess (3), Stockton, California, USA does not count | 4.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 9/10 | 5/5 | 19/20 | Dec 28, 2008 One of the best stouts available right now in my opinion. Pours thick and deep, dark brown, almost black. Short dull tan head. Flavors of bittersweet chocolate and coffee. Not for the weak of heart! ScottB (73), Bristow, Virginia, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Dec 27, 2008 Pours pitch black with a thick brown head. Maybe it is just my palate today, but this tastes awful -- almost sour. Also very thin. Not at all what I expected. GJF (492), Cedar Rapids, Iowa, USA
| 4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 17/20 | Dec 25, 2008 A wonderful stout. Pitch black with a rocky, dense tan head. Tons of roasted malt in the flavor with a nice creaminess to the body. Finishes dry with just a touch of bitterness. Lovely. popery (156), San Francisco, California, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | Dec 22, 2008 A thin, somewhat disappointing Russian Imperial Stout with a flavor profile that is not bad but merely average for the category. I was really expecting more from Samuel Smith with this one. The Taddy Porter knocked my socks off and their other beers are generally, at least, excellent values. This offering is basically RIS light. It lacks the depth and complexity of flavor that is nearly commonplace amongst its competition. The feel is somewhat watery and really fails to bring the required breadth. That said, it is not bad, at all. This rating is very much a product of its place relative to some truly great competition, and with Old Rasputin sharing its shelf space, it is not even a very good value in this neck of the woods. I imagine other areas have better Imp Stouts and RISs as well. At any rate, the beer pours opaquely black with good lacing from a nice beige mocha head. There are notes of toasted malt and English, minerally hops. The flavors just are not big and strong enough. Also, while I usually like a thick, viscous feel on my Imperial Stouts, this one manages it while still being too watery, which turns out to be not altogether pleasant. Not a bad beer but far below the heights of the style. mikalooch (163), , New Jersey, USA
| 4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 5/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 | Dec 21, 2008 Pours deep black with a generous head for an imperial. Smells like chocolate mixed with nuts, almost like nutella. Coffee and caramel with malty undertones, feels sticky and a bit thinner than other imperials. Finishes nice, sweet with a slight anise undertone. Good beer, very drinkable, well balanced. chops (60), Brantford, Ontario, Canada
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Dec 19, 2008 From the LCBO. 550ml bottle. Served at room temperature. Pretty damn good. Lots of chocolate, coffee, a little bit of burnt flavors that are enjoyable. I will buy this again! toddkrem (78), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Dec 17, 2008 Seemed a little thin for an imperial. Has good taste and easily drinkable. Nice color and head cbeers21 (564), Miami, Florida, USA
| 3.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 | Dec 15, 2008 Deep blzckish pour with decent head. Robust, malty, dusty and delicate. This is an example of the style which has had some restraint appllied. The softer and not overwhelming chocolate and coffee touches are well balanced by an equally powerful bittering hop quality. Not as powerful as others, but its balance and subtlety work well.
|