 bhensonb (4387), Woodland, California, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 |
May 19, 2007 Aroma of light grass and noticeable malt. Orange tinged gold coor with a white head that collapsed, but left some lacing. Medium+ mouthfeel; low carbonation; sort of a warm malt foundation, and there is definitely some decent pilsener type hop in the finish. If it was not quite so malty, and had a bit more hop, I’d think it actually was a pilsener. Way better than Bud.
BREWMUSKCLES (1091), New Jersey, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
May 13, 2007 not bad. has some good components, but something is lacking. enjoyed at mt. fuji with a spicy menu. dry and low on flavor. grainy and interestingly strongish carbonation. smooth,grassy,ricey and moderate of body.
badinplaid (103), USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Apr 26, 2007 Can...Pours well...clear amber color...decent head...Great with sushi but wouldn’t drink with any other dishes.
AleDrinker (1090), Sunnyvale, California, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Mar 30, 2007 A bit richer than it’s premium draft version. This beer has more malt and more body. Overall it is very similar to the regular Sapporo. Good with sushi... When else would you drink it?
pantani (1902), Salinas, California, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 |
Mar 28, 2007 Body is a nice gold hue, thick fluffly white head. Aroma is lightly maltly, with corn, very light hops in the background. Taste is decent, easy drinking, not overcarbonated, taste has a light hop content, light caramel note, with the malts playing through. Pretty good for a ’premium lager.’
beisen (90), California, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Mar 16, 2007 Been a long time since I’ve had something from a can...Having said that, it was better than I expected. Not great, but not bad for a can. Pours gold with a tall fizzy head. Goes down relatively smooth, but has a bit of skunkiness.
JohnnyJ (1353), Carlsbad, California, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Feb 10, 2007 Aroma is grainy and light malt. Appearance is clear gold with a fizzy head. Flavor is light and pissy. Tastes of grain, some malt, and a little sweetness.
jetzler (622), oklahoma city, Oklahoma, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 7, 2007 This brew is not so bad, nothing special just your average malt liquor on a saturday night a touch of light continental hops, with very light malts fortunately no rice sweetness. Not bad but noot great.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)