leitrim65 (398), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Sep 29, 2005 Clear copper color with a thin white head. Grassy hop nose. Light bodied with gentle grassy hop flavors and notes of fruit. The finish leaves a touch of lingering hops. Lacks punch but it offers a nice change of pace for an IPA. pineypower (1104), Pine Barrens, New Jersey, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Sep 28, 2005 Had this one a few times, never rated it. Strong fuggles aroma that told of a good taste. The pour was typical of an IPA. Taste lacked something, maybe a little too much something, don’t really know but something is missing axilla (962), New Providence, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Sep 28, 2005 I’m not a huge fuggles fan. I found one fuggles ipa that I really liked. Unfortunately, it’s not this one. Not a drain pour by any means. A little thin on the taste and palate. Luckily, the day I bought these, I was working outside all day and just needed a "cold one". kumite56 (461), Cordova, Tennessee, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 12/20 | Sep 27, 2005 In my opinion the aroma and the appearance of this beer was its strongest qukalities. This beer poors a nice off white head on an orange body. The lacing was nice as well. The palate I thought was a little weak and the malt backbone lacking as well. The beer was nicely balanced though with a sl sweet initial and a nice bitter finish. Grasszy hopps predominate in the finish. WISEGUY572 (1246), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 5/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Sep 27, 2005 Updated: Jul 28, 2007An IPA is my favorite style, but this one doesn’t quite come together for me. Perhaps I am used to the more intense slam of American Pacific Coast hops? Something like a Stone with Willamette or Hop Devil with Cascade? This is nice, but not great. Beautfiful golden appearance with a huge, vanishing white head. Intense floral and classical bitter hops, more like an old style Bass than an American, sweet malt, and a long bitter finish. Mouth is a little thin, maybe, malt is a little unbalanced, maybe? Really liked it, didn’t love it.// Had draft at the brewery. Slighly nicer palate, not much better as a beer. BillyM (149), St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Sep 24, 2005 Clean & crisp. The hop flavor comes through more in the finish than elsewhere. Starts semi-fruity and finishs with the bitterness. The balance just isn’t there - something’s off. Not a bad session beer, but nothing I would probably choose. cazort (419), Newark, Delaware, USA
| 1.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 7/20 | Sep 21, 2005 Updated: Aug 13, 2009(Bottle, once in 2005, once in 2009) This beer has changed drastically on the two occasions on which I tried it. Also, both times, it didn’t seem to match what other reviewers wrote, which makes me wonder about consistency. (in 2005:) Aroma of alcohol, hops, metal. Very bitter, bitterness is up front and unpleasant. Aroma and flavour are transparent, thin, cold. Unbalanced, and lacking in complexity. Extraordinarily harsh; the bitterness hit immediately. There was a little sweetness and a vague malty flavour in the background but it did not blend well and was overpowered by the straight bitterness. Without a doubt the worst IPA I’ve ever had. (in 2009:) This is a totally different beer. Much less bitter and hoppy...in fact, doesn’t even taste remotely like an IPA. The hops still have a strong presence, but the beer is more balanced. At the same time, I still don’t think this is a good IPA; the hops are now too weak, and the beer lacks complexity. gpet (1), Snellville, Georgia, USA does not count | 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 | Sep 17, 2005 Has somewhat smoot start. Then progresses into a bitter middle with a strong pleasant bitter aftertaste.
|