RateBeer
Sierra Nevada Bigfoot 3.88 2045

Sierra Nevada Bigfoot

Percentile
98
overall

bottled
common

on tap
common

Broad Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
20453.89/5.03.88/5.0Winter9.6%92.2Snifter
Commercial Description:
Gold Medal Winner, Great American Beer Festival (Ales: Brown, Bitter and Pale 1987, Barleywine 1988,1992,1995). Sierra Nevada Bigfoot is an award winning example of the English Barley Wine style. It boasts a dense, fruity bouquet; an extremely rich, intense, bittersweet palate; and a deep, reddish-brown color. This ale is superbly balanced between an almost overpowering maltiness and a wonderfully bittersweet hoppiness.

Beginning Gravity:23 Plato
Finishing Hops:Cascade & Centennial
Dry Hops:Centennial, Cascade & Chinook
Bittering Hops: Chinook
Ending Gravity:6.0 Plato
Yeast:Top Fermenting Ale Yeast
Malts:Two-row Barley Malt, English Caramel Malt, Dextrin Malt
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 Archibaldo de la Cruz (409), Finland
4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/516/20

Oct 24, 2009  
Bottle. Deep red colour with a medium-sized off-white head. Fruity aroma with notes of grapefruit, lemon and malt. Bittersweet and fruity flavour with caramel, malt and a hint of alcohol. Medium-bodied and a long bitter aftertaste.

allendodd (58), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
3.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/56/104/514/20
Dec 14, 2009    Updated: Dec 15, 2009
2008 bottle from my cellar. Pours a dense yellowish head over a cloudy amber/brown beer. Nose is big barley wine from the get-go, but the taste has a bunch of hop bitterness right up front. Hops dominate the flavors through the middle and end, and I’m a little disappointed at that. There seems too much hops here and the big, sweet barley wine flavors don’t shine the way I was hoping. If I feel up to two of these monsters tonight, I might open one that is a couple of years old and re-rate. I really don’t remember it being this bitter. 2007 the next evening. This bottle is dramatically darker, much less hoppy, much more complex. This one has chocolate, tobacco, molasses, tobacco, caramel, and tobacco. Mouth feel is much smoother but alcohol seems to have come forward with the passing of hops. This brings my rating up .1, but I think this beer wants another year or two. Maybe I’ll pull our an older one tomorrow.


 KyotoLefty (1447), Kyoto, Japan
4 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/58/105/516/20
Dec 12, 2009  
Vertical tasting, 2002, 05, 06, 08. Very interesting. ’02 rating posted. Oxidized caramel aroma outstanding, with menthol, caramel, hop and a bit of funk in the mouth. ’05 had a wonderful big oxidized caramel aroma, but the flavor was a bit off, with lots of peppermint: 8/4/7/4/14. ’06 almost unoxidized, with little nose but a nice, smooth, balanced flavor: 7/4/8/4/15. ’08 also very nice, with lots of fruit and tons of hops. fresh and tasty but still a bit too harsh: 8/4/7/3/15. The menthol / peppermint was surprisingly evident in all but the ’08.


thorongil2 (70), , Ontario, Canada
4.8 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
9/105/59/105/520/20
Dec 12, 2009  
(bottle) (2008) clear, reddish brown colour with small tan head; aroma of longans, dried fruit, some citrus; complex and balanced flavour with long lightly bitter finish; excellent


 malrubius (1002), Valley Stream, New York, USA
4.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/59/104/518/20
Dec 9, 2009  
RATING #1000. Bigfoot mini-vertical 2009, 2008, 2004 in snifter. 2009: Bright amber with lasting flat head and lace. Toasty brown sugar bread and slight alcohol aroma. Toasted brown sugar nuts mild fruit with very assertive grapefruit and resiny woody dry hop finish and slight alcohol warmth. Mouth numbing hops. Excellent. 2008: Bright amber with lasting flat head and lace. Toasty brown sugar doughy molasses and woody hop aroma. Toasty brown sugar ripe fruit assertive earthy grapefruit and woody hop dry bitter finish. Awesome. Almost at its peak of perfection. 2004: Darker reddish amber with a few big bubbles and ring. Earthy woody aroma. Rich sweet brown sugar and ripe fruit with woody toasty sweet wet earth finish. Awesome. Very slight oxidization. I really thought two-year old would be best, but this might be better. One of my all-time favorites for the past twenty-or-so years. I was glad to find that somehow I hadn’t rated it yet, even though I drink at least a case each year, so I could celebrate my 1000th rating with it (not to mention I got married this morning). Whoohoo!!!


 jumpjet2k (160), Austin, Texas, USA
4.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/105/517/20
Dec 5, 2009  
Bigfoot 09 bottle, about 10-11 months old by now. Nice rich dark amber, lightly hazy, with a pretty tan head that stays to the very end. Floral, citrusy hops still strong on the aroma, but I get some caramel malt alongside. Rich malt flavor, a little hot, and still a very nice hop presence. Really good at this age. Alcohol is lightly present, which works well, and there’s a nice smooth palate. A pleasure to drink - again and again, the Sierra Nevada brewers prove they know what they’re doing.


 TET (240), Finland
3.9 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/105/57/104/515/20
Dec 4, 2009  
Slightly red, copper brown beer with medium beige head. Aroma is exhilarating, strong tropical fruits, pine needles and sweet malts. Flavour is strongly hoppy, malty and bitter in the end and aftertaste is long. Slippery and nice to drink. This beer based on great hops, and that is impressed, but if there would be more freshness, would it be better, maybe or not...


 leems (149), Portland, Oregon, USA
4.6 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
9/105/59/105/518/20
Dec 2, 2009  
The beer store I frequent has had a six pack with one missing of big foot on top of one of their fridges for quite a while. I finally talked them into pulling it down and it was the 2007 vintage! Yum! This is a beautiful beer, not as dark as most barley wines one sees now days. This is a shining example that is not overly sweet, well developed, deep complex flavors. A real winner, I wish I had one fresh so I could compare, it was probably good but I bet not this good.


Chickencoop (32), California, USA
4.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
8/104/58/104/518/20
Nov 25, 2009  
I think when you see barleywine, most people will be turned off, or expect some odd-ball brew that is just intended to get you hammered, this is not. When I first strated drinking this I was reminded of a big IPA, but sweeter. The brew is very smooth and complicated, and considering the high ABV, this is very drinkable. This in my opinion was what the DIPA are trying to be, but then again this is a barley-wine so maybe i’m off. Good stuff, must have from one of our great California breweries.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC