 xsketchyx (184), Oregon, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Mar 18, 2004 Decent lightly hopped amber. Not much of an aroma to speak of though. Not the slightest bit offensive but not terribly innovative either.
Crit (2401), New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 9/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
Dec 3, 2002 NOTE: only drink in Eugene..other locations not up to snuff.
Sparkling amber with great lace. Roasted malt nose.Toasted malt taste with a medium hop finish.Good balance
A wonderful Oregon beer, that pales in other locations
heykevin (1269), Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Mar 28, 2002 Caramelly sweet is well-balanced by nice but muted hops. Not as much in the hop department as I would like to see in this style, but nice none the less.
joet (1702), Fulton, California, USA
| 0.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 |
Aug 31, 2001 This shoe is stinky! Some malt flavors. How can this whole place reek of sterilant and this beer still suck with bad bacteria? Why would an establishment serve this?
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)