 BeerFanDan17 (397), Land O Lakes, Florida, USA
May 23, 2008
Had this many times, but most recently last night on draft. Very yeasty and hoppy aroma. Pours light with small head. Flavors are crisp with strong bites of yeast and hops, but not hoppy per se.
MexiFinn (15), Nevada, USA
Oct 5, 2008 11.2 oz. bottle, over priced and overrated, an average macro-lager, taste is a bit tinny and bitter, light gold yellow, weak head... I’d only buy if on sale. Cheers.
drjay44 (160), Colorado, USA
Oct 5, 2008 Draught...pours a small thin head which rapidly collapses, nice lacing, pale clear yellow....mild nose, really miinimal character...tastes of mild hop....watery palate. Typical of the"better’ macrobrews.
Pyobon (170), Sydney, Australia
Oct 4, 2008 Draught. Clear golden with lots of head. Vegetable aroma. Light body, medium carbonation. Vegetable / hop taste. Refreshing, but not great.
nightblooming (4), , California, USA
does not count  Oct 4, 2008 hay, floral, citrus, leaves, alcohol, vanilla, ginger, pale, sparkling, aminimal head, lightly bitter, light body, thin feel, fizzy, bitter,
Uaru02 (14), Simpsonville, Kentucky, USA
Oct 3, 2008 Tap. I succumb to the hype and tried one during a layover in Chicago. Overall, this beer is decent. A bit of sweetness with a hint of unfiltered yeast. Good for a Pale Lager. Yet, this beer proves to me to be more of a fad or status symbol than truly a good beer. I see and hear many people who graduated from the typical mass produced swill to Stella Artois and think that they have found somethng special. Must be good since it costs more, right? Just another alternative to other country club fare like Heinekin or Corona.
|
