weaselkenievil (738), Cheshire, England
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 | Aug 27, 2009 Bottle. Amber coloured with thin off white head. Not much flavour filtering through my rubbish nose. Flavour does the job though. Caramel, little fruity flavour, nice dry hoppy finish. Very drinkable, good session beer. HoppyAlesToYou (29), , Indiana, USA
| 3.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 4/5 | 8/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 | Aug 26, 2009 My main impression from this was tea leaves. Kind of like a light version of Three Floyds Alpha King. Amazing flavor for an ABV of only 4.4%. It would be a fantastic session beer, yet flavorful enough to satiate in a 12 ounce dose. tomhenderson (127), Carolinas area, USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 | Aug 26, 2009 12 oz bottle. Nice amber color and head. Citrus hop in the aroma and taste, with a maltier backbone than I expected, but I was told this was an APA rather than an Amber. Lightest beer I’ve had from Stone, but yet another winner. Heathen (810), Riverside, New Jersey, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 13/20 | Aug 25, 2009 THOUGHTS: I couldn’t believe Stone made a session ale. It was a little watery for something as hoppy as it was. With all the hops I don’t know how long of a session it could be for me. Overall it was a lot of flavor for a low alcohol beer. The hop aroma was nice, but the hop flavor was a little weak. The bitterness on the other hand was high.
TECHNICAL: Bottle. Poured a clear, dark brownish amber with an average to large, off-white head that kept a thick sheet and left good to excellent lacing. The aroma was moderate grain, toasted and nutty malts caramel and toffee, and moderate pine citrus, lemony hops along with slightly less herbal hops. The initial flavor was sweet, bitter and acidic; while the finish was bitter and acidic with a fairly long duration. There was caramel, toasted malt, tea, lemony citrus hops, pine and a little bitter hops. The light to medium body was fairly dry with fairly soft carbonation and a metallic and slightly chalky finish. petematte46 (226), Dallas, Texas, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 | Aug 24, 2009 Pours a really deep amber color, topped with an active head that fades fairly quickly. Not a lot of lace. Flat, faintly metallic aroma is not incredibly inviting. Very dry, hoppy flavor for an amber, and not much of a finish. TreborWhip (99), Reading, Pennsylvania, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 | Aug 22, 2009 Enjoyed a bottle at Flow in Jim Thorpe, PA with lunch. The beer was served ice cold in a pilsner glass. Citrus notes with a bitter finish. The beer probably would have been better if served warmer and in a proper glass. IndianaRed (1560), Boise, Idaho, USA
| 4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 5/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 16/20 | Aug 20, 2009 Bottle pours a clear mahogan with a dense beige head.Lovely malt and hop aroma.Slightly citrusy and sweet ans woody. Flavor os woodand leathery with a surprisingll sharp bite. Lingering bitterness that seemed prett toigh for an amber. But this IS Stone after all.
Snappy and brisk and full of flavor for 4.4 pct. jetzler (622), oklahoma city, Oklahoma, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | Aug 20, 2009 Bottle, pours a nice amber color with a tan head that is fluffy. Hop forward aroma. Nice easy to drink, some crisp hops, almost a quaffer, I think its nice not overly obnoxious like some Stone brews.
|