deyholla (695), Bloomington, Indiana, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 | Aug 23, 2009 On tap at the brewery. Poured amber with a thin white head. Aroma was weak with notes of malts and a bit of hops. Flavor pretty basic, and quite drinkable with a hoppy flavor. Quite rough on the tongue and a bit too dry. Hudspart (371), Hudsonville, Michigan, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 | Jul 22, 2008 On tap at the brewpub. Pretty weak and thin. Not much aroma or flavor. Not bad, just forgettable. CharlesDarwin (1843), Point Judith, Rhode Island, USA
| 2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 8/20 | Sep 11, 2006 Pour of mahogany-tinted red, with fringes of basketball. Head of creamy ivory. Faint malt and pizza sauce aroma. Served ice cold. There’s no carbonation in this beer, it’s becoming to be a trademark of this brewery. Maybe I could at least convince them to serve their beer on oxygen. There really isn’t flavor here, just some dryness that acts as such and there could maybe be a hint of hop sugars. Ick. I think they distilled the tannins from the river water and added it to this thing they attempt to call beer. Palate is exceptionally revolting. It has a painful scorching dryness that scours the tongue and burns the roof of your mouth. Garbage. they really need to go out of business and stop embarassing craft beer.
|