 21iceman40 (1731), vienna, West Virginia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 9/20 |
Aug 28, 2009
I thought this might actually be good, then I read the label and saw it was yet another city brewing product. It tasted literally like water up front and then finished alright with a bit of a light hop feel. Its not even a session beer as its too damn watery, but whatever, I have 10 more of these damn things to deal with.
thill25 (218), Orlando, Florida, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 11/20 |
Nov 30, 2009 Pours amber with a decent sized fluffy, white head. Little to no retention...Heavy caramel malts on the nose along with some sweet fruits (apples, pears)... Extremely mild hop profile, lite bitterness accompanied by caramel sweetness. Medium carbonation with a watery mouthfeel...wouldn’t track this one down again.
Fratto (751), Arlington, Texas, USA
| 2.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Nov 26, 2009 Bottle from the Kroger on Lamar. Light orange pour with a small white head. Roasted nut, malt, and grass aroma. Taste is metallic and hoppy, but a bad kind of hoppy. A little caramel. More metal in the finish.
Cybercat (812), Georgia, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Oct 24, 2009 Aroma is crisp, malty and slightly fruity, providing hints of pear and banana. It pours an appetizing clear golden amber with a decent white head. Flavor is malty and a little hoppy, just a bit on the thin side. Texture is fairly tingly and leaves a finish that is more hoppy than malty. Overall, fair to middlin’.
phishpond417 (1953), Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Sep 22, 2009 From Pyuke: Poured a golden-orangeish colour with a small white head. Aroma was pretty weak as was the taste. As mentioned before, pretty much a beginner Pale Ale. Rather be a begger then a beginner! Some mild citrus notes on the finish, other then that mainly dominated by malts. Can’t like ’em all, but glad I tried it- Thanks Paul :)
502Flavors (629), Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Sep 2, 2009 Had this and RB deleted my rating. Prolly from that crash. One of the lesser pale ales out there. Not much going on. The hops just weren’t there. I am shocked to see that this is a City Brewery beer!!!
kp (8500), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 7/20 |
Aug 31, 2009
Name: Tap Room No 21 Moes Backroom Pale Ale
Date: August 08, 2009
Mode: Bottle
Source: Tasting, Ticker
Appearance: clear copper, wispy off white head
Aroma: dry caramel malt aroma with floral hops
Flavor: lightly sweet malt flavor, floral hops, balancing bitterness, long bitter finish
Aroma: 4/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 4/10; Palate: 6/10; Overall: 7/20
Rating: 2.1/5.0
Drinkability: 6/10
Score: *+/4
DarkSong (111), Dacula, Georgia, USA
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 4/20 |
Aug 25, 2009 12 oz bottle. Pours a pale yellow with a hint of orange and a medium sized white head. It has a slightly skunky aroma. It has an unpleasant bitter taste and a burnt taste with a little pepper taste. All of the tap room no.21 beers I’ve had were weirdly awful. I honestly can’t believe anyone would enjoy any of them. I seriously taste a bitter taste that doesn’t seem to come from hops, a burnt taste and a pepper taste here.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)