ontario102 (794), Boise, Idaho, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | Jul 5, 2005 Can: Sweet, smooth bodied, and dull. Light bodied and pretty weak, overall. heemer77 (4304), Savannah, Missouri, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 | Jun 19, 2005 From a nitro can. The body is dark orange that approaches amber. The aroma is iced tea, flowers and grass. The taste is very light and woody iced tea. This has the typical nitro can mouthfeel that is creamy and smooth. barenada (211), Georgetown, Indiana, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | May 29, 2005 (draft) Good lacing. No detectable aroma, flavor, or aftertaste. There was just a hint of bitterness that faded before swallowing was complete. Not bad, but very boring. Vac (2389), San Diego, California, USA
| 3.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 5/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 | May 11, 2005 Pours with a clear amber body topped by a thick creamy head with lots of lacing. The aroma is slightly sweet and malty with a nice underlying bitterness and some fruity notes. The flavor is similar with a bit more hoppy bitterness. Medium bodied and smooth. DocLock (4648), Lower Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 10, 2005 I agree completely with schultsc on this one. Like a younger bastard brother of Old Speckled Hen. Not horrible, mind ya, but not something I’d take to the barn to try a shag with my gal from Leister. Schultsc (483), Henderson, Nevada, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 | May 8, 2005 Updated: Jun 27, 2005This is a nice pub ale but has a lot less going for it than Old Speckled Hen, Wexford, or Abbott, which have a ton more flavor. This is an enjoyable beer but not enough to make it really remarkable. Refreshing with a little bitterness and a nice, smooth mouth feel. jgentgesdo (564), Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 5/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 | May 4, 2005 Pours amber with a beautiful rolling head typical of nitrogen widget beers. Nose is faint grassy hops, very faint malt flavors, mild cream. The flavor is just like Cream-o-Wheat. Mouthfeel is very creamy. Pleasant, rather boring, reasonable bitter. GuilTTy (538), Cherry Hill, New Jersey, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | May 4, 2005 Widget can. Clear deep amber pour supporting a classic widget-generated creamy off-white head with very good retention. Faint aroma of malt with a hint of summer fruits. Flavor suffered from the deadly duo of the can & widget but some toasted malt, hay, apricot & biscuit survived. Mouthfeel was creamy at first but fell flat rather quickly. Finish was not memorable. Overall, not worth seeking out outside of England.
|