 rodneykm (109), Westminster, South Carolina, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 4/5 | 4/10 | 4/5 | 14/20 |
Aug 24, 2007 Updated: Jul 26, 2008Pretty decent. Nice amber color with a decent aroma (not too strong or weak). Mouth feel was above average and the flavor was pretty solid with a bit of a bitter after taste. Slightly above average.
bkurtz (276), Peru
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 28, 2007 Bottle. Poured a nice amber with a small, quickly fading head. Some sweet malt, but a almost no hops. Very average.
PorterPounder (3148), Tallahassee, Florida, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Jun 19, 2007 Chattanooga, Tn. - Riverside Liquors - 12 oz bottle. Light copper pour, light off-white head - no lacing. Slightly medicinal aroma - some overripe fruit. Flavor is sticky, some nuttiness, a hint of citrus - but nothing prominent. Mouthfeel is nondescript - kind of boring rolling over the tongue. This one just did not do it for me.
matta (1139), Tampa, Florida, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
May 12, 2007 12oz bottle
Pours a bright amber body and a fluffy cream-colored head. Aroma is sweet with malts, grainy, with a large amount of nuttiness, notes of green apple, and a spicy earthy hoped finish. Unfortunately, the beer doesn’t seem to ever come together at any point in the experience…
DrBayern (1137), Morehead City, North Carolina, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
May 7, 2007 12 oz. bottle pours out clear amber with a medium white head, looks pretty good actually. Unfortunately, it’s all downhill from here. Light grainy aroma with a hint of some spicy hops. Thin, watery mouthfeel and an overall lackluster palate. Flavor sows some nutty sweetness and some light hop bitterness that is enough to leave a dry finish. I wouldn’t call this bad, but it’s just unrewarding. If this is their flagship beer, I’m not going to stand in line to try their other offerings.
eaglefan538 (2400), Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 |
Apr 15, 2007 Bottle courtesy of Shag/Clash. Poured a light amber color, thin initial head, a couple rings of lacing, but not much else going on here. The aroma was sour pine cones. The flavor was sour (lemony/citrus) pine cones, dry bitter nuts, butter, and lots of water. In fact, if not for the watery-ness, this thing may have been pretty disgusting. I guess no one reading up to this point is surprised that my comments on mouthfeel are: watery, watery, and watery. Thanks to Matt for hooking me up with this one upon request, only doing what was requested to grab another state!
LilKem (1210), Marietta, Ohio, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 2/5 | 9/20 |
Apr 3, 2007 some malty bready citrusy grainy flavors with a little carmel and walnuts. still very very thin and carbonated but i’m thinking this is how this brewery works.
unclemattie (2437), Georgia, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Mar 14, 2007 12oz bottle. aroma of malt and butterscotch. dark amber color. thin white head. grainy flavor. tangy hop finish. light bodied.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)