RateBeer
Thomas Hooker Hop Meadow IPA 3.48 258

Thomas Hooker Hop Meadow IPA

Percentile
87
overall

bottled
common

on tap
available

Regional Distribution
Find this beer

Add Distribution Data
send corrections | shelftag |
RatingsAverageScoreSeasonalABVStyle PctlServe in
2583.49/5.03.48/5.0Autumn6.5%74.7Shaker, Tulip
Commercial Description:
HOP MEADOW INDIA PALE ALE. The American cousin of our ESB. This pale ale was originally brewed in 19th century England to survive the long ocean voyages to their troops stationed in India - hence the name India Pale Ale. To keep the beer from spoiling during these four- to six-month odysseys, they produced a stronger, more generously hopped ale. Our creamy IPA emphasizes traditional West Coast Chinook and Cascade hops to yield a hophead's delight of a brew: just-right complexity that's not too sweet - or over-the-top with hops.
 Most Recent Top Raters Highest Ratings Who's Rated This?  
 Glouglouburp (2877), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2.7 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
5/104/55/103/510/20
Oct 23, 2008  
In short: A soapy piney IPA. Ok at best.
How: Bottle 12oz. Drank fresh immediately after receiving it from jjpm64, thanks a lot John.
The look: Partly cloudy golden-copper body topped by a large beige head with medium retention
In long: Nose is piney, slightly fruity and a bit soapy giving the impression of some kind of those little green tree air freshener that you suspend to the rear-view mirror. Taste is more of the same. I don’t know if it was my bottle, but their was a strong aromatic chemical aspect to this beer. Not bothersome but just a bit “off”. Body is fluffy, carbonation is tickling. Taste is chemical Pine-Sol™, caramel, tree bark, citrus fruits and earthy notes. Mild-medium bitterness. Overall rather dry. Not a very good beer by any means but I can’t complain because at $2 it’s a cheap Thomas Hooker, and if I could one but without the “Thomas” that would be really nice.


 obxdude10 (1563), Pottstown, Pennsylvania, USA
2.1 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
4/103/54/102/58/20
Oct 17, 2008  
I was disappointed the second I started to pour this beer into my glass. The dark color wasn’t very consistent with the style, and the aroma didn’t feature much flowery and spicy hops at all. The body was medium and drinkable, but lacked character. There was a huge lack of hops in this IPA. It just wasn’t there.......at all. I tasted too much malt, caramel and sweetness. This beer didn’t have that typical IPA bite to it. It wasn’t spicy, it wasn’t bitter and it wasn’t abrasive. I expect my tastebuds to be almost ruined by an IPA, and this didn’t even come close. This was a huge disappointment.


 decaturstevo (2010), decatur, Tennessee, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/56/104/514/20
Oct 10, 2008  
Deep amber almost brown pour with off white creamy head and lace. Aroma of roasted malt, an almost brown sugar like aroma and citrus. A hint of sweetness followed by a metallic flavor and a pretty decent hop bitter. Medium bodied and a tad foamy. A drinkable beer but at 6.5 how would that work out:)


 mansquito (842), Boston/Philadelphia, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/57/103/515/20
Oct 5, 2008  
Pours a dark amber with an off-white head and has a pretty swank hoppy and fruity aroma. The taste itself is actually pretty subdued for an IPA and in some ways this beer resembles more an APA. It has a smooth and mellow feel to it. Really well-balanced and has just enough hops to hit you a little, but not too hard. Rather floery.


 Butters (1651), Virginia, USA
3.3 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
6/104/57/104/512/20
Sep 23, 2008  
Bottle curtesy of Beerhawk. Don’t know the vintage, but due to the mellowness of it, I’d guess it had some age on it. Pours a rich clear brown with reddish highlights and nice dark tan head. Suprisingly malty aroma, some raisin, and faint floral hops. A well balanced ipa.


 elihapa (1067), Honolulu, California, USA
3.2 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/56/104/512/20
Aug 31, 2008  
Bottle. Floral bouquet on the nose. Flavor is initially malt and fruit semi-sweet, and the palate quite mellow. As the flavors sat in my mouth then the hoppy touches kick in with a nice bittering effect. Palate, however, stays mellow, which did not grant me that crisp flowery IPA flavor that I love so much. Overall, I good quality IPA, but lacking the zip to kick it to the next level.


 Bungalo22 (326), Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/104/57/103/514/20
Aug 21, 2008  
This Hooker poured a dark amber color with a very small head. It smelled nice and hoppy and had a slight malt aroma as well. On taste it was smooth and hoppy. This was a good IPA. The beer finishes a bit sweet )maybe carmel like flavors). A good well balanced IPA. I was surprised and satisfied.


 blipp (1730), Newark, New Jersey, USA
3.5 Aroma Appearance Flavor Palate Overall
7/103/57/103/515/20
Aug 21, 2008  
Bottle. Pours clear red brown with a thin beige head. Aroma has orange, caramel, and candy sugar. Well balanced flavor, with a nice sweetness and some bitter floral hops. Nice lasting bitter finish.



We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »

View Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Share Your Opinion!
Get started reviewing beers at RateBeer.com now.

First, choose your user name

About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Log In | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Feedback?
Copyright © 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC