Oakes (8101), gone rambling, Cambodia
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Jan 17, 2001 Not great as a beer, but fairs well next to other pale, non-alc lagers. JoeMcPhee (5010), Jackson Heights, New York, USA
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Oct 8, 2004 Damn trickery! I asked the waiter about this and he didn’t know anything. Low ABV my ass! Bastard! Anyway, I got a very pale golden beer with a very thin smattering of lace. Zero aroma. Pale malt flavour, similar to Clausthaler NA but with less body, if that’s even possible. Sammy (4028), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 | May 3, 2004 A small buzz from the alcohol still possible without food. Better in a meal. Best feature: More of a beer than a malt beverage. Some malt sweetness, but more hop bitterness. Pronounced carbonation. fine red colour. Radek Kliber (3962), Toronto (Can) Krotoszyn (Pol), Ontario, Canada
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 25, 2004 This beer was sampled at Cest What (bottle). Aroma of wet wheat, old moldy malt. Thin body, flavor a la blended processed cardboard, light sweetener added. Leaves bad mouthfeel, which thankfully does not last long. jerc (3945), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| 1.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 3/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 25, 2004 Bottle, C’est What. Crisp very pale yellow body with a gorgeous fluffy white head. And that’s the best part about it. Aroma is actually sort of unpleasant with a hint of malt to it. Tastes like the malt extract from a homebrew diluted many times. Long lingereing aftertaste pollutes your mouth for a while. Palate is very light. I have had it now, now I can never have it again. CapFlu (3483), Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
| 1.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Jan 4, 2003 Mmmm... 0.9% Alcohol. What else can one expect? Poured fine, though I think the picture to the left is generous... Coloured water. DougShoemaker (2856), Toronto, Canada
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 | Jan 12, 2003 Mild sweet aroma, golden, large white head. Metalic, malty corn. Sticky sweet, fair for a low alcohol beer. tupalev (2617), Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | May 7, 2004 I prefer this to the light lager. Actually a little more flavour in this and maybe even a hint of a malty taste. Still not something I’d reach for, but when compared against others in its style, it fares pretty well. But 0.9%, so why, really?
|