farmboy (218), Barwon Heads, Australia
| 0.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 2/10 | 1/5 | 2/20 | Jun 21, 2007 Truly awful drink. I can’t call it a beer, because it’s not. It’s a liquid, so therefore I can only refer to it as a drink. Tasteless filth. I am proud of myself for having finished the bottle. I usually buy two to try just in case the first one doesn’t give me an accurate indication. I didn’t get to the 2nd bottle. This is as vile as it gets.
mkel07 (556), Brisbane, Australia
| 1.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 6/20 | May 18, 2009 375ml bottle. Bland to look at when poured with a taste to match. Thin and watery with no head, small white bubbles only. Skunky aroma with a heavy hop mixture. Bland taste and texture, not flavoursome at all. Blockley (23), Sydney, Australia
| 0.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/10 | 1/5 | 1/20 | Apr 19, 2009 Can @ home
You would have to drink this to find out how bad it really is, but that is not something that I would recommend. This ’brew’ tastes phenomenally bad; I never poured it from the can so I can’t comment on the appearance but it had a rancid aroma and a nasty watery texture and metallic taste. Totally unpalatable. I imagine rust would taste much like this does. bookman10 (92), Osseo, Minnesota, USA
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 | Jan 6, 2009 Another rather thin and watery, mass-produced Australian beer. This is the sort of stuff you buy a case of for a house party, not something you buy to savor and compare tasting notes. But you could do worse. A cold VB on a hot Australian day can work wonders. beerledgend (919), Waterloo, Wellington, New Zealand
| 1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 1/5 | 3/10 | 1/5 | 3/20 | Aug 11, 2008 Smelt of the Tourist town, Rotorua, as soon as I opened the bottle. Clear bright gold colour with thin white head that disapated quickly. Bland thin and watery with mild metalic bit at the end. rmussman (906), California, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 9/20 | Jul 7, 2008 Hmm. Interesting. Its not too bad. The alchohol is kinda weak. Overall its got a decent flavor and is worth a try. thesimmos (13), Brisbane, Australia
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 | May 1, 2008 This beer wishes it was XXXX gold. and tastes like VB missing its legs. Still it is better than being offered a cartlon mid.
I would buy either this or gold depending what is on sale. Thylacine (271), Tasmania, Australia
| 1.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 5/20 | Apr 20, 2008 A little on the thin and watery side with a high carbonation. Mild to moderate bitterness with a slight metallic taste. Drinkable (it must be as I just drank it) but but just as uninteresting as most other mass produced pale lagers jkm (189), Australia
| 1.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 3/10 | 2/5 | 4/20 | Apr 20, 2008 Clear gold/amber colour with a very thin white head. Thin bodied with average carbonation. Bland, watery and boring...VB with less alcohol....Not a good beer.
- 330ml bottle.
|