 kp (8396), Woodstock, Georgia, USA
| 2.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Nov 7, 2009
Date: September 24, 2009
Mode: Draft
Source: Brewpub
Appearance: hazy yellow, fine white head, drippy lace
Aroma: sweet malt aroma, corn sweetness
Flavor: sweet malt flavor, little to not bitterness
Aroma: 5/10; Appearance: 6/10; Flavor: 5/10; Palate: 6/10; Overall: 8/20
Rating: 2.4/5.0
Drinkability: 6/10
Score: *+ /4
BückDich (4848), McCall, Idaho, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 12/20 |
Feb 11, 2007 Tap @ übertavern: Golden color of course, light head and lacing. Fruity nose with nice clean hops and malt. A clean flavor too with some toasty malts and lightly grassy hops. Overall it’s not that strong, but it has the traditional baltic type malt liquor notes but delivered in a much cleaner fashion.
presario (2983), Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
May 28, 2006 Gold. Thin head. Tastes like malt liquor so I guess they succeeded. Whoopee.
beerinmarch (2800), Washington, USA
| 2.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 8/20 |
Jun 19, 2006 Hmm, this trend of malt liquors is getting out of hand, but somehow i’m crazy enough to keep trying them, and continue to get the same results. Very strong beers, with nothing exciting. I’m not sure why they make these, it seems like you have nothing to win, even if you make a great one, its still malt liqour and still doesn’t taste good, but i guess if they are just tryin to stick it to OE or King Cobra, they have succeeded, booyah! our malt liquor is better!
harlequinn (2745), Tacoma, Washington, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
May 14, 2006 Clear, ture on true golden coloring, with a small frothy white head. Fruity aroma, with some sweetness in the flavor, very well balanced, and very good for the style and what they were trying to make. Perfumey hops, sweets malts, with some albeit adjuncts. Decent.
riversideAK (2731), Shoreline, Washington, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Jun 18, 2007 Had this at Brouwers a while back. From what I remember it was mostly sweet malt with fruitiness and some grain. Poured an orange color. Flavor was mostly sweet. I remember it being sweet, fruity, and pretty heavy. Alcohol notes come through as well. I want to try this one again most definitley.
BrewDad (2370), Olympia, Washington, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 18, 2006 [Tap – Fathers Day Brewery Tour 06]
Schlitz has nothing on this beer. This was a great easy drinking beer. A good yellow color and a strong malt background. The beer was easy to drink and would be perfect for the college crowds.
Sham (1846), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 10/20 |
Jan 14, 2007 Light amber with a foamy head and good lace. Sweet, sweet malts. Fruity aromas with a ton of alcohol. Lots of candy like sweetness comes out in the flavor. A bit much. Foral or piney hops. Thick and chewy with a strong finish of sweet fruits.
|
Rate This
Find This Beer (Want/Have)