 texasbartender (160), Sugarland, Texas, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jun 14, 2008 The beer pours a lightly hazy yellow gold with almost no head. The nose is a light mix of aromatic hops and floral malts. The taste is what you would expect from the nose; a watery mix of hops and yeast. No a bad beer but not one that calls to me at night.
jigglyjock (159), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 2.9 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
May 23, 2006 Updated: May 24, 2006Pours every-so-slightly hazy golden yellow with a frothy white head. Appearance is also noticeably carbonated. Aroma of flowery, piney, grapefruit, citrus hops, accompanied by sweat bready malts. Head retention is slightly below normal with good lacing. Flavor starts off with bitter/sweat hops. An OK IPA.
cyanescens (156), Seattle, Washington, USA
| 3.4 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
Dec 23, 2006 Im down to session this beer. Crisp IPA, the best Widmer offers in my opinion. But then again, many far better IPA’s are found. Could be hoppier
paulmetzger (152), Pocatello, Idaho, USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 3/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 15/20 |
May 24, 2006 Light golden with ample carbonation. Strong pine/citrus aroma. Starts mildly sweet and somewhat thick, turning to a hoppy pucker and then finishing pretty smooth but leaving a strong piney aftertaste.
jmcguire1969 (149), Lafayette, Colorado, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Oct 13, 2007 This tastes like a Bridgeport clone...nothing special but drinkable. These English IPA’s sure are salty.
chadje (130), Pasadena, California, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Jun 11, 2008 Updated: Jul 21, 2008A decent IPA that pours a pale color with a nice head. Scents of hops, but not as strong or sweet smelling as the better IPA’s. Taste is smooth and again not as good or bitter as the best IPA’s.
nahthan (129), Oakland, California, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 4/5 | 13/20 |
Aug 23, 2006 From bottle bought at a store somewhere between Portland and Ashland, OR. Clear, filtered crisp appearance. Small, white minimal head. Low head retention. Sweet, subdued hop aroma. SRM is very light, very appropriate for the style. Flowery, grapefruit, mango hop flavor with a solid back-of-the tongue hop bitterness. Sweet and caramel, but not so sweet that is lays on your tongue. I’d really like to try this with lower carbonation on hand pump. A bit commercial, a bit sanitized, but as a result it’s balanced, damn tasty and drinkable. Better than you might expect from wheat beer fanatics. Good!
jackamackson (127), USA
| 3.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 4/5 | 15/20 |
May 28, 2006 amber/gold color with a nice soapy white head. hoppy aroma. sweet and sorta carmamely with a moderately bitter citrus finish. pretty good.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)