lyebaptism (17), USA
| 3.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 16/20 |
Dec 3, 2003 Good sized head that lasted a bit to long for my liking. Pretty amber color. Flavor wasn't the best i've had but was quite good. Decent offering from Wild Goose
 Dorwart (1815), Robbinsville, New Jersey, USA
| 3.3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 7/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Dec 2, 2003 Thin head with good carbonation. Head last for a while. Color is a deep copper. Aroma is interesting. I detect peppermint, malt and hops. Body is a little thin but flavorful and well balnced between the malts and hops. Finish is slightly bitter. A decent amber ale.
jeffc666 (1892), Fairfax, Virginia, USA
| 3.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 4/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Dec 2, 2003 From 2000 Notes - Clear amber. Hoppy nose. Flavor was more bitter then expected for the style. Decent but not great.
hopscotch (5490), Vero Beach, Florida, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 7/10 | 4/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 11/20 |
Aug 21, 2003 Sparkling clear, amber beer. Small, fizzy, khaki head.
Smells sweet (honey) and malty and vineous, but without any real body in the artificial-esque aroma.
Sweet on the tongue. Chewy, but no real flavor to go with the texture and malt. Medium-bodied with a syrupy mouthfeel and lively carbonation. Dryish, very astringent finish.
Holdwine (908), Beertimore, Maryland, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 14/20 |
Aug 3, 2003 Nice solid drink. Not an amber in my book, but fun to drink. Nice lasting head. Plenty of complex maltiness with a nice hoppy blitz. Not cloying at all. Very smooth.
Sturgess (173), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| 2.6 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 2/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 2/5 | 14/20 |
Jun 23, 2003 The Amber is the best Wild goose out there in my opinion, not being a big amber fan I was impressed with the head and the slight sweet lingering aftertaste. Malt's were definentely nice and spicy!
happy4hops (369), Bel Air, Maryland, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jun 4, 2003 Updated: Oct 20, 2004Pours out with a solid head/lace.Decent amber.Tastes of the standard wild goose maltiness.Slight hops in there.Smooth enough on my palate to kick back a couple.Good middle of the road brew.These guys need to let there "different styles" of beer be just that.All there brews taste way too much the same IMO.I live in MD by the way.Hard to tell the difference between there amber and IPA in nose.Tastes like malta goya made a beer or somethin'?
ToadMan (554), Washington, Washington DC, USA
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 8/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
May 30, 2003 I realy liked the aroma, very malty and rich, realy got my hopes up. The taste was somewhat of a let down, the powerful maltieness was in there, but as were some sour hops that didnt mix very well with the malt. Still the malt made it ok, but far from great.
|
Rate This
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)