 haukur (684), Reykjavik, Iceland
| 3.2 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 2/5 | 7/10 | 2/5 | 15/20 |
Jul 31, 2005 Updated: Aug 15, 2005canned; quite unusual, it´s sugary but not sweet, some nice bitterness, a bit special taste to it, nothing wrong with this brew, but fails to be anything else then a decent lager, re-rate in 4 weeks when I´ll get this on draft in Zywiec RE_RATE : bottled; unbeilevable difference from the can, clean and crispy, excellent lager
harrisoni (6828), Ashford, Kent, England
| 2.1 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 2/5 | 8/20 |
Jul 26, 2005 Bottle. Sickly nose, golden thin white head, this taste, Not used to drinking lager for so long not sure what to make of it. Nothing wrong with it, but that sickly first aroma stayed with me throughout the bottle
chriso (4796), London, Greater London, England
| 2.7 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 16, 2005 OK, so I didn’t drink this in ideal tasting conditions - from a can at the Oval watching England getting trounced by Australia at cricket. Couldn’t tell you anything about the appearance and getting the aroma through the little ring pull hole was a bit difficult too. I got some strange looks for trying. This came over as a decent enough lager with some soft malt and a touch of hop. Maybe a touch of sweetness, but there was reasonable bite and kick. Not surprisingly, there was a metallic edge. Nothing to write home about though.
MIBRomeo (1965), Wisconsin, USA
| 1.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 3/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 1/5 | 7/20 |
Jul 16, 2005 light yellow small white head decent lacing. I smell nothing, palate is like carbonated water. Flavor a bland corny carmel blah.. not good.
DerWeg (762), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 3/5 | 4/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 9, 2005 A pretty okay EastEuro lager with workmanlike hops and smooth, thin malts. Refreshing but not all that interesting. I sometimes get small hints of some weird mid- and after-taste. Budvar or Staropramen are far better.
dwyerpg (2537), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
| 3 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 6/10 | 3/5 | 5/10 | 3/5 | 13/20 |
Jul 8, 2005 Smells, looks, and tastes better than expected. Very bubbly and heady, but unlike most lagers, the head is not atrocious. A pretty darn good lager (either that or its just really hot out).
demitriustown (700), Shelby Township, Michigan, USA
| 2.5 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 4/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 10/20 |
Jul 7, 2005 Aroma is skunky, overtones of alcohol, a slight hit of malts. Appearence is a clear golden. Poured with a medium foamy head. Bitter sweetness comes through at the end. Clean and clear palate. Decent nothing special probably will stay awy too. Average.
trokini (1027), San Diego, California, USA
| 2.8 | Aroma | Appearance | Flavor | Palate | Overall | | 5/10 | 2/5 | 6/10 | 3/5 | 12/20 |
Jul 5, 2005 First Polish beer I’ve tried. Thin but sweet. Better than a Budweiser. Probably would not drink again.
|
Statistics
Find This Beer (Want/Have)