RateBeer
   Home Sign Up or Login Advanced Search
   People Ratings Events Places Forums Shop Magazine
Forums > Beer / Site News | Beer Talk | Homebrew | Beer Trade | Beer Travel | Food/Beer | Europe/Down Under | Industry | OT - Lite | OT - Medium | OT - Dark

Alesmith Speedway The Shit...is back...


read 5718 times | 134 replies | posted 11/3/2009 3:52:12 PM
Reply Reply to topic      Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14


premium
stefanje 940:21
Event added. 11/4/2009 4:12:41 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
lithy 1650:93
For everyone saying that any recipe change needs a new entry, I thought the policy here was that beers that change slightly but are still sold as the same beer without any attempt to distinguish it from last years version can stay under the same entry, but when a brewer specifically changes the beer and lets everyone know and that they intended to make it a slightly different version of the beer, it can have a new entry. 11/4/2009 4:35:48 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
cgarvieuk 4177:24
never mind if its a new rate or not, Whos gonna Hand bottle me some

couldnt care less if i get a rate or not, still sound well worth trying.


go on, you know you want to help out a oopr lod sdrunk csotsman
11/4/2009 4:57:17 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
cgarvieuk 4177:24
Originally posted by eaglefan538
I think the cask/non-cask entries of many English beers are dumb. But, I’m probably just the dumb one. So, I let it be. Good gracious.


Dont get me started and im not even ENGLISH
pasturised and non pasturised are just so different.


so lets just agree that your Dumb. it works for me evil grin
11/4/2009 5:07:24 AM

Post a reply

Private message


MrManning 1644:48
It sounds like a new entry to me. If a completely different coffee is added, it will change the beer in many ways, much like a different barrell. 11/4/2009 5:28:37 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
admin
Oakes 8092:421
Originally posted by MrManning
It sounds like a new entry to me. If a completely different coffee is added, it will change the beer in many ways, much like a different barrell.



I’m going to play devil’s advocate here and ask if the change was Brand A bog standard arabica to Brand B bog standard arabica, would anyone even care? Would the brewery even say anything? Do something high profile and people get excitable. Do something low profile - even if it is a more substantive difference - and nobody notices nor cares. We can’t set policy based on the profile of the beer, the brewer or the event.

As for this particular beer, I’ll have to consider what the precedents are and make a call accordingly. If it’s on sale at O’Brien’s that’s part of it. The recipe question is the next part.
11/4/2009 6:21:49 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
gunhaver 1025:13
the brewery changed something in the recipe and gave it a new name and selling it as something new

wtf more needs to be said
11/4/2009 6:31:20 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
lithy 1650:93
Originally posted by Oakes
Originally posted by MrManning
It sounds like a new entry to me. If a completely different coffee is added, it will change the beer in many ways, much like a different barrell.



I’m going to play devil’s advocate here and ask if the change was Brand A bog standard arabica to Brand B bog standard arabica, would anyone even care? Would the brewery even say anything? Do something high profile and people get excitable. Do something low profile - even if it is a more substantive difference - and nobody notices nor cares. We can’t set policy based on the profile of the beer, the brewer or the event.

As for this particular beer, I’ll have to consider what the precedents are and make a call accordingly. If it’s on sale at O’Brien’s that’s part of it. The recipe question is the next part.


I think the intent of the brewer has to have something to do with it. They are specifically releasing this as a different beer. If tomorrow they changed Speedway to use Kopi Luwak from here on out and continued to just called it Speedway Stout, I don’t think it would warrant a new entry.

Of course no brewer is going to try to get people excited over a change to a different stanrdard grade coffee, but if one wanted to, I think that would warrant a new entry as well.

Just my opinion at least.
11/4/2009 6:32:22 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
BMan1113VR 2820:108
Originally posted by Oakes
Originally posted by MrManning
It sounds like a new entry to me. If a completely different coffee is added, it will change the beer in many ways, much like a different barrell.



I’m going to play devil’s advocate here and ask if the change was Brand A bog standard arabica to Brand B bog standard arabica, would anyone even care? Would the brewery even say anything? Do something high profile and people get excitable. Do something low profile - even if it is a more substantive difference - and nobody notices nor cares. We can’t set policy based on the profile of the beer, the brewer or the event.

As for this particular beer, I’ll have to consider what the precedents are and make a call accordingly. If it’s on sale at O’Brien’s that’s part of it. The recipe question is the next part.
They did do a change from "Brand A to Brand B" about a year ago with little fanfare...
11/4/2009 6:41:51 AM

Post a reply

Private message


premium
NobleSquirrel 1106:55
Originally posted by SamGamgee
Didn’t Dark Lord change coffee brands at one point in time?


Yeah, in 2006 (I think) they switched from Starbucks to Intelligentsia, though the coffee isn’t a huge part of DL, imho.cheers!
11/4/2009 7:26:20 AM

Post a reply

Private message

RateBeer Forums> Beer / Site News Reply       Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Add A Brewer | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Log out | Feedback? | Copyright 2000-2009, RateBeer LLC