Get your facts straight McPhee...anyone and everyone pretty much agreed that it WAS commercially available at the original release. What part of anyone that was present could purchase it by the glass or by growler don’t you understand?
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
Seriously...how do you contradict yourself in the same post? First you state that there was a "marked recipe change and the beer was made commercially available" then you state that "this was kept out because it wasn’t commercially available." How can we be consistent if you can’t even keep your post consistent?
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
yeah maybe it was dark lord idk.
but for some reason when you add vanilla beans to a beer its a recipe change.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
I think that falls under spices.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
kp has been correct with all his explanations.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
KP for mayor!
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
"Coffee is coffee" is sort of a narrow view. You could also say barley is barley and hops are hops or beer is beer, but all of this website would disagree on those counts.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
#1 This site takes things too seriously- I don’t add every beer I have ever had on cask as a separate entry, maybe I should just to be a "shit."
#2 If the commercially available Shit isn’t in the DB, there are a bunch of other beers that should be deleted.
#3 Don’t mess with Jake.
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
#1.your new name is ghey.
#2.ill agree with your #2
#3.your new name is ghey
|
Post a reply
Private message
|
|
http://www.home.no/mrweizel/gay%20thread.jpg
|
Post a reply
Private message
|