RateBeer
   Home Sign Up or Login Advanced Search
   People Ratings Events Places Forums Shop Magazine
Forums > Beer Talk | Homebrew | Beer / Site News | Beer Trade | Beer Travel | Food/Beer | Europe/Down Under | Industry | OT - Lite | OT - Medium | OT - Dark

New Top 50 beer from Struise


read 7517 times | 157 replies | posted 12/29/2008 2:42:20 PM
Thread Frozen
Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16


premium
urbeer 40:4
Originally posted by Odeed
Originally posted by puzzl
Originally posted by urbeer
We took some Black Albert samples out of a bourbon barrel early September and bottled them of in magnums. Not ready for sale yet but to check out quality and towards the LCRBM08 meeting in Holland. Some Magnum bottles were opened too at the Alvinne Proefzolder lately.


Should the beer be on the site yet in that case?




dude its struise,of course it is.i mean look at dirty horse.its still not for sale and has been in the top 50 for months!




I guess you are probably right, strictly taken I guess it should not be on the site yet. But where does one start? We take quality samples from time to time, share it with professional people and friends, just to know what they think about that beer at that time. Naturally we cannot help some are so enthusiastic about a brand, they launch reviews or ratings before actual bottling, both negative or positive.

I really would not mind that all those ratings would be erased, then again I don’t know if all those raters would be happy. They sampled a brand, at a certain time, and judged it, good or bad... Cheers, Urbain

12/30/2008 3:41:26 PM

Private message


premium
puzzl 2660:72
Originally posted by urbeer
I guess you are probably right, strictly taken I guess it should not be on the site yet. But where does one start? We take quality samples from time to time, share it with professional people and friends, just to know what they think about that beer at that time. Naturally we cannot help some are so enthusiastic about a brand, they launch reviews or ratings before actual bottling, both negative or positive.


It starts when the beer is available for sale to the public.
12/30/2008 3:43:17 PM

Private message


premium
Odeed 1680:14
Originally posted by puzzl
Originally posted by urbeer
I guess you are probably right, strictly taken I guess it should not be on the site yet. But where does one start? We take quality samples from time to time, share it with professional people and friends, just to know what they think about that beer at that time. Naturally we cannot help some are so enthusiastic about a brand, they launch reviews or ratings before actual bottling, both negative or positive.


It starts when the beer is available for sale to the public.


yup,according to the ratebeer bylaws,a beer needs to be "commercially available" before it can even be rated.so if this isnt the case with these two.then they (and any others)should be erased completely.
12/30/2008 3:55:20 PM

Private message


premium
Odeed 1680:14
Originally posted by urbeer


I really would not mind that all those ratings would be erased, then again I don’t know if all those raters would be happy. They sampled a brand, at a certain time, and judged it, good or bad... Cheers, Urbain




yeah well a bunch of people were not happy when a certain beer was not only knocked out of the top spot in the top 50.but deleted from the database altogether.
but hey,rules are rules right?
12/30/2008 3:57:26 PM

Private message


premium
Cletus 5060:175
Originally posted by Odeed
Originally posted by puzzl
Originally posted by urbeer
I guess you are probably right, strictly taken I guess it should not be on the site yet. But where does one start? We take quality samples from time to time, share it with professional people and friends, just to know what they think about that beer at that time. Naturally we cannot help some are so enthusiastic about a brand, they launch reviews or ratings before actual bottling, both negative or positive.


It starts when the beer is available for sale to the public.


yup,according to the ratebeer bylaws,a beer needs to be "commercially available" before it can even be rated.so if this isnt the case with these two.then they (and any others)should be erased completely.



Agreed. This and dirty horse are no different from the ratings of The Shit that got nuked. If that was nuked, both of these should be nuked since they are not commercially available beers.
12/30/2008 3:57:44 PM

Private message


premium
CanIHave4Beers 918:56
Originally posted by Odeed
Originally posted by urbeer


I really would not mind that all those ratings would be erased, then again I don’t know if all those raters would be happy. They sampled a brand, at a certain time, and judged it, good or bad... Cheers, Urbain




yeah well a bunch of people were not happy when a certain beer was not only knocked out of the top spot in the top 50.but deleted from the database altogether.
but hey,rules are rules right?



pray tell
for us igornant newbies
what beer are you speaking of>?
12/30/2008 3:58:34 PM

Private message


premium
Odeed 1680:14
Originally posted by CanIHave4Beers
Originally posted by Odeed
Originally posted by urbeer


I really would not mind that all those ratings would be erased, then again I don’t know if all those raters would be happy. They sampled a brand, at a certain time, and judged it, good or bad... Cheers, Urbain




yeah well a bunch of people were not happy when a certain beer was not only knocked out of the top spot in the top 50.but deleted from the database altogether.
but hey,rules are rules right?



pray tell
for us igornant newbies
what beer are you speaking of>?


read the cletus post above.

^^^^^^^^
12/30/2008 3:59:47 PM

Private message


glennc :0
Originally posted by Cletus
Originally posted by Odeed
Originally posted by puzzl
Originally posted by urbeer
I guess you are probably right, strictly taken I guess it should not be on the site yet. But where does one start? We take quality samples from time to time, share it with professional people and friends, just to know what they think about that beer at that time. Naturally we cannot help some are so enthusiastic about a brand, they launch reviews or ratings before actual bottling, both negative or positive.


It starts when the beer is available for sale to the public.


yup,according to the ratebeer bylaws,a beer needs to be "commercially available" before it can even be rated.so if this isnt the case with these two.then they (and any others)should be erased completely.



Agreed. This and dirty horse are no different from the ratings of The Shit that got nuked. If that was nuked, both of these should be nuked since they are not commercially available beers.


Wasn’t the Dirty Horse on tap at The White Horse? I know we had a sample when visiting London, Urbain, but I don’t know if they actually sold the cask. If they did, it’s commercial. Doesn’t matter if it’s only part of a batch or a hole batch that is commercial available.

Glenn c
12/30/2008 4:43:04 PM

Private message


premium
PilsnerPeter 2667:95
An Imperial Stout in the top 50? Ground breaking... 12/30/2008 5:24:58 PM

Private message


premium
¾ 5009:631
oh look, it’s the Speedway Shit vs Dirty Horse bitchfest once again! 12/30/2008 5:41:04 PM

Private message

RateBeer Forums> Beer Talk Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16


About RateBeer | Add A Beer | Add A Brewer | Edit Personal Info | 100 Beer Club | FAQ | Log out | Feedback? | Copyright 2000-2010, RateBeer LLC