overall
24
43
style
Serve in Shaker, Weizen

bottling
unknown

on tap
unknown

distribution
unknown

Add Distribution Data
RATINGS: 17   MEAN: 2.72/5.0   WEIGHTED AVG: 2.73/5   EST. CALORIES: 159   ABV: 5.3%
COMMERCIAL DESCRIPTION
A wonderfully light, drinkable, refreshing ale.

A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5


  • Rate This
  • Locate Sellers




2.4
aenimopiate (177) - The United States of Texas, Texas, USA - JUL 15, 2009
I had this beer years ago, but I still remember it well. I remember liking this one for its honey characteristics. It’s ok that it’s now retired, as almost every brand has its own honey beer at this point.

1.9
personanona192 (5021) - Mississippi, USA - JUN 14, 2009
had on of these saved from a long time ago. Pours a light golden color with a 2 inch head. Aroma is faint and consists of mostly sweet malt notes. Flavor is very sweet and only a little bitter. Taste more like flat flavored malt water than beer. Palate is spritzy. Finish is foamy.

3.1
milljam (682) - Norman, Oklahoma, USA - FEB 10, 2009
Although I’m not a fan of wheat beers.....I liked the subtle honey flavor with this one. it wasn’t overpowering...and it added a nice sweetness to the beer. It ashame they don’t brew it anymore.

1.8
SphinxTX (2875) - Mata Gorda, Texas, USA - DEC 17, 2007
Ok, I do not care for beer with honey flavor. This beer was decient quality, somewhat sweet. Color seemed yellow, goldish like. Had decient fruity notes. Im not a fan of this though.

1.3
kp (10877) - Woodstock, Georgia, USA - SEP 1, 2007
Date: 05/14/1998

hazy yellow, whispy white head, slightly sweet aroma, light malt flavor, hint of sweetness,

Aroma: 4/10; Appearance: 2/10; Flavor: 2/10; Palate: 2/10; Overall: 5/20
Rating: 1.3/5.0
Score: 4
-------- /> The score was calculated based upon the notes and an old scoring system.

2.8
SudsMcDuff (8597) - .....Manchester United.........., Texas, USA - NOV 16, 2006
I had this beer a couple of years ago and haven’t seen it at my local stores for a while, When I had it, Nice pale red, more of a brown color, some head, with not a lot of lacing, the taste was great....if it was stronger, a satisfying beer...

2.2
fly (1490) - austin, Tejas, Texas, USA - AUG 8, 2005
Although perhaps not as bad as I make it out to be, not what I would consider to be a true (or at least well made) wheat beer in thge European sense. When you see HONEY in a name, be afraid. Okay, that’s a gross generalization, but so was this beer.

1.8
3fourths (9492) - Boulder, Colorado, USA - MAR 5, 2005
An old semi-regular drinker back in the early undegraduate days, it was fizzy and yellow with a decently-present fake honey and sugar flavor. Appealed more as a fruit beer with its sweetness.

2.9
KAggie97 (3529) - Ugly, Hot, and Humid Spring, Texas, USA - OCT 31, 2004
Not a bad beer, but it needs more of something in it to make it better. Honey, maybe?!! False advertising, sure, but it’s not bad.

3
FtWorthBrew (105) - Fort Worth, Texas, USA - AUG 19, 2003
Great thrist quenching beer, very light, hopefully spoetkl will cycle it back through the markets soon.


We Want To Hear From You



Join us! RateBeer is made by beer enthusiasts for the craft beer community. Your basic membership is free and allows you to read all beer ratings. Click here to create your account... and give your opinion!

Join Us »



Page    1  2


A tick is a star rating
  • Currently 0/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5