Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped. There are plenty of other beers that are just as good. It reminds me of the Kernel love fest a few years ago. Do any of the London Crew remember them?
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
We operate in different leagues to be fair so no ... haven't a clue what you're on about !
|
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped.
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
So you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with the overhyped shit? Why would we expect you to have an objective view on the matter?
|
Originally posted by FatPhil
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped.
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
So you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with the overhyped shit? Why would we expect you to have an objective view on the matter?
That's one interpretation... Or he drinks better beer.
|
|
Originally posted by b3shine
Originally posted by FatPhil
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped.
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
So you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with the overhyped shit? Why would we expect you to have an objective view on the matter?
That's one interpretation... Or he drinks better beer.
Oh shit don't look at my scores.
|
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped. There are plenty of other beers that are just as good. It reminds me of the Kernel love fest a few years ago. Do any of the London Crew remember them?
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
We operate in different leagues to be fair so no ... haven't a clue what you're on about !
For my 3.1 average I spent on average less than £2 a beer. To get my average up to 3.4 I would need to be spending a lot more money for the sake of a 0.3 boost. So yes we operate in different leagues, but i am happy to be a solid performer in my league.
If I buy a beer for £2 and it's shit it's no big problem. However if I spent £20 on a beer that was shit I would be pissed off.
|
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped. There are plenty of other beers that are just as good. It reminds me of the Kernel love fest a few years ago. Do any of the London Crew remember them?
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
We operate in different leagues to be fair so no ... haven't a clue what you're on about !
For my 3.1 average I spent on average less than £2 a beer. To get my average up to 3.4 I would need to be spending a lot more money for the sake of a 0.3 boost. So yes we operate in different leagues, but i am happy to be a solid performer in my league.
If I buy a beer for £2 and it's shit it's no big problem. However if I spent £20 on a beer that was shit I would be pissed off.
So how much did you spend on the Hill Farmstead in question and why did you change your original score from 0.5 to 3.8?
|
Originally posted by FatPhil
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped.
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
So you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with the overhyped shit? Why would we expect you to have an objective view on the matter?
Your average beer rated is a 3.11. Does this mean that you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with pedestrian beers for the sake of driving up your number of ratings to gain imaginary status on a beer rating website? Because that seems worse than drinking good beer to me.
|
|
Ok, going to feed the trolls. Intrigued to see someone create a thread about hyped up beers and choose HF as an example of that. They've always been mid hype / high quality in the hype/quality diagram. Following social media I see plenty of hyped up shit and insane trade offers but I rarely see those for Hill beers. Also at 74 rated HF beers with an avg rating of them at 4.12 so no, they're not overhyped, you're wrong.
|
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
Originally posted by Theydon_Bois
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener
I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped. There are plenty of other beers that are just as good. It reminds me of the Kernel love fest a few years ago. Do any of the London Crew remember them?
Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1
Mine is at 3.4
We operate in different leagues to be fair so no ... haven't a clue what you're on about !
For my 3.1 average I spent on average less than £2 a beer. To get my average up to 3.4 I would need to be spending a lot more money for the sake of a 0.3 boost. So yes we operate in different leagues, but i am happy to be a solid performer in my league.
If I buy a beer for £2 and it's shit it's no big problem. However if I spent £20 on a beer that was shit I would be pissed off.
So how much did you spend on the Hill Farmstead in question and why did you change your original score from 0.5 to 3.8?
It was part of a trade for malt likkas. Macboost asked if I wanted an HF in place of a malt Likka. Since I was going to share the beers with RichtheVillan I asked him if he would prefer a HF beer. He did. I would rather have had a Malt Likka, but I am too considerate of others. Altogether the trade cost me about £45 and many hours searching for White ciders.
I gave it a 0.5 as a inside joke then changed it to a proper score the next day.
|
Originally posted by _angst_
Ok, going to feed the trolls. Intrigued to see someone create a thread about hyped up beers and choose HF as an example of that. They've always been mid hype / high quality in the hype/quality diagram. Following social media I see plenty of hyped up shit and insane trade offers but I rarely see those for Hill beers. Also at 74 rated HF beers with an avg rating of them at 4.12 so no, they're not overhyped, you're wrong.
Thanks for the food.
I am sure you are right.
|