Hill Farmstead Is Over Hyped shit?

Reads 6554 • Replies 76 • Started Saturday, October 21, 2017 4:31:39 PM CT

The forums you're viewing are the static, archived version. You won't be able to post or reply here.
Our new, modern forums are here:
RateBeer Forums

Thread Frozen

Message RichTheVillan beers 10685 º places 101 º 16:43 Sun 10/22/2017 Sarkys 0.5 rate created a discussion point so objective achieved
Message Theydon_Bois P admin beers 40846 º places 1239 º 16:55 Sun 10/22/2017 Originally posted by RichTheVillan Sarkys 0.5 rate created a discussion point so objective achieved Hmmmmmm
Message michcam8 beers 593 º places 34 º 18:19 Sun 10/22/2017 HF and shit should not be mentioned in the same sentence unless referring to bong hits in the porta potties. Many, many more hits then misses.

Message blipp beers 14902 º places 219 º 18:24 Sun 10/22/2017 Sarky had his tastebudes burned off by Terry's cask goldes.
Message DietPepsican P beers 1592 º places 63 º 18:35 Sun 10/22/2017 Originally posted by blipp Sarky had his tastebudes burned off by Terry's cask goldes. Sun temp golds
Message Ibrew2or3 P beers 10542 º places 353 º 19:07 Sun 10/22/2017 [Forum post removed]
Message nuplastikk P beers 9880 º places 73 º 21:09 Sun 10/22/2017 Magic Hat wannabes

Message FatPhil P beers 26286 º places 998 º 02:26 Mon 10/23/2017 Originally posted by b3shine Originally posted by FatPhil Originally posted by Theydon_Bois Originally posted by SarkyNorthener I have had a few of their beers now. They have been good, but definitely over hyped. Your average beer rated weighs in at 3.1 Mine is at 3.4 So you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with the overhyped shit? Why would we expect you to have an objective view on the matter? Your average beer rated is a 3.11. Does this mean that you're admitting that you have surrounded yourself with pedestrian beers for the sake of driving up your number of ratings to gain imaginary status on a beer rating website? Because that seems worse than drinking good beer to me. No, I simply have a preference for traditional and well-established styles that people with no history of drinking beer (I've been drinking what I consider to be good beer since the early 80s) seem to have no love for at all, prefering "culinary experiments?.. by people who don’t even seem to like beer in the first place."
Message haukur beers 2184 º places 32 º 02:44 Mon 10/23/2017 Originally posted by FatPhil The only HF beer I've had was a gusher. That's an amateur mistake caused by people messing with things they don't have full control over. insert lol smiley look, everybody has a right to their opinions. You can hate HF all you want but I do think you will not find a better brewer as Shaun Hill. To even suggest amateur mistake in brewing/bottling at HF is laughable. Sure there are some gusher,but I´ve had gushers from Dupont/Duvel/Westmalle and other well established breweries that have been doing this forever.
Message The_Osprey beers 10591 º places 178 º 03:19 Mon 10/23/2017 In all seriousness, great brewery but there seems to be a HF score baseline. Rose tinted glasses. If you dressed up any classic Belgian beer and called it HF Bob it would average 4.3. People seem to give marks for 'drinkability' that they would give to no other beer in that style. Good example below. Where do you see people saying 'this is so malty, clean and drinkable - 4.1'? Never, except HF https://www.ratebeer.com/beer/hill-farmstead-marie/510890/36509/