Originally posted by chriso I think Joe, want to get to point where places are better represented and you can see easier what beers are on now, but that needs a way bigger userbase. But add in forums, and RB still has a Unique position, but is it/will it be enough. Only time will tell. It sadly a lot smaller sample than i hoped. but Forums seem to be where most people think we stand best chance https://community.ratebeer.com/t/todays-poll-what-do-you-think-will-make-rb-gain-market-share/304 |
I believe that the acceptance of ticks within our rating system is another and major case of dumbing down the site to become a inferior Untapped. Whereas Untapped can handle the throughput of largely thoughtless ticks, this site is suffering. Going down this route is a one way street, there will be no way back to be seen as a quality source of beer data and information unfortunately. So yes it does appear that Ratebeer is being 'destroyed', although that term is quite strong, more allowed to die quietly. |
Originally posted by imdownthepub This, and also the potential technical difficulties the separate weighing of ticks vs ratings would bring, is why I would suggest separate averages and such. |
Originally posted by imdownthepub So do you think RB has a problem as is, Do you think its become way less relevant to the wider beer community. See i think we have problems. I think RB is dying a slow death, with most new users ignoring us, When they look to find beers untappd has them RB doesnt. This is the very reason i joined RB over BA. So even leaving aside the different methods both sites use, i think their DB is becoming better than ours, even with the errors that used to exist(and may still do) If you dont belive theres an issue, then were never going to see eye to eye on this one, but assuming you do see the same problems i do, what solutions do you think there are. And why would accepting ticks make us an inferior untappd. We still have a lot of Review data, i still intend to review. Many other will. Yeah i accept theres a risk we end up with a poorer site than we want, but i think that far greater risk is that ratebeer becomes irrelevant and joe stops running it. and we then have no site. Far better to be brave and try build a better site all be it that compromises need to be made between many current user mind set and new user mind set. Im 99% certain id join Untappd if i came along now. in fact i think thats todays poll. https://community.ratebeer.com/t/poll-of-the-day-30-10-2017-where-would-you-go/358 |
Originally posted by cgarvieuk Disagree. RB is suffering from a death rattle. We're fucking losing rating, ratings are floating around not attached to any particular beer, or any paricular user. The site for rating beer is becoming useless for that task. It's fucked. |
Oh my goodness. This is beyond ridiculous. I understand the grumbling but for everyone's sake, including the grumblers, let's have a little reality check. |
Originally posted by joet It also decreases the positive effect of change, there is no attachment. Has I stated in the beginning. My main issue isn't the "Work in Progress" this is part and parcel of Ratebeer and i imagine every website that develops and changes. What my concern is, is the untappd direction it seems to be going in and I am worried this will be done at the detriment of useful stats. I read quite a bit on Buddhism Joe and strongly believe in the following. Everything follows the rule of Impermanence. Even Ratebeer. |
The sky is falling, says chicken little. Duck for cover! LOL. |
Originally posted by SarkyNorthener I guess this is all very strange thinking to me in that it lacks considerable imagination. There were a few people who, back in 2004, didn't understand how RateBeer and Beer Advocate could coexist and they very firmly believed one of us would soon die. Those same people believed everyone who liked beer would belong to one site or the other. They also assumed the market was fixed and we were fighting over share. Some of those same people either suggested or feared that the way to stay alive would be to simply replicate the functions of the other site. They were very, very wrong. I knew so then and everyone knows so now. Untappd wouldn't even exist if these opinions and assumptions were even remotely correct. So I don't really feel this is an addressable fear. It stems from a limited idea about what we are, what human behavior is out there, and where we're going to adapt to it. It assumes there are few options. It assumes cataclysm. It assumes a market share fight. None of these assumptions make any sense. |
Originally posted by joet I'll BM you my address! |
2000- 2025 © RateBeer, LLC. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service